fantasy football trade?

someone proposed a trade that would give me Keyshawn Johnson and Trent Green in return 4 Michael Vick and Carnell Williams. should i do this? im thinking no... but this is my 1st year w/ fantasy football...

BenchCoachcom2006-08-14T18:42:17Z

Favorite Answer

No - Cadillac Williams is goping to be a Fantasy Stud RB. You can never give up an every down back. Running Backs rule Fantasy Football, you can not vlive without them.

Tucker C2006-08-14T18:41:33Z

No. Trent Green and Micheal Vick are about equal. So, the deciding factor in the trade is if Carnell Williams is worse than Keyshawn Johnson, which he clearly isn't. Don't do the trade.

aar88fan2006-08-14T21:16:41Z

I'm going to say Yes.

While Keyshawn's not a GREAT WR... he's got Steve Smith on the other side of him, therefore, my thinking is Steve Smith will be double covered and Keyshawn will be the one with yards and TD's (he's a great player in the endzone. His catches are most of the time, unbelievable)

Trent Green is a solid QB. Michael Vick isn't. Period.

Carnell Williams had a stellar year last year, but I don't think he'll have that great of a year this year.

heat_mizor2006-08-14T19:10:14Z

Without knowing your points system no one can answer this question correctly. In my league Green is better than Vick by far. Keyshawn wil have a better year this year most think. I do agree that Williams is the main player in this trade but we don't know how deep you are either. I would say no to the trade due to needing more info!

tre_loc_dogg20002006-08-14T18:40:35Z

deny that trade, although Trent Green and Keyshawn are both good players that have their moments of heroism the fact remains that they are both getting up there in age. Plus Vick is a points machine between his rushing and passing (which could be better), and Cadillac is in his second season after going on a tear in his first four or five games yeah he had injury issues but he has also had an offseason for conditioning and reflection on what he can do to avoid injury in the future.

Show more answers (4)