Cons-A one year old and 5000 embryos are trapped in a fire, you can only save baby or embryos which do choose?
any why?
Gary, just answer the question
any why?
Gary, just answer the question
Anonymous
Favorite Answer
I start with the baby.
When you go into a fire you pick up the one who has the best chances to survive.
Got a question how many people would you kill in order to find a cure for acme.
I thought I give you a silly question too.
sociald
Well I would save baby of course in that situation. 1 I know what to do to help save a baby, and chances are the 5000 embryos are going to be used in some experiment by some scientist who knows.
Think Richly™
I would save the 1 year old if I can't save the embroys too. What's with the embryos? Is this a stem cell research center?
This has nothing to do with cons vs. liberals - it's a question of individual choice and morality.
RS
Baby
rosi l
A friend once ask me, if my house were on fire and I could only save one of my four children, which one would it be? My answer was then and is now, I would give my life trying to save all of them. Why? Because I love my children, and I value life. The friend had no children, if she did she would have known better than to ask the question.