Was Jim Tressel not serious last year?
With all of the reports about both teams going into the game tonight, I am wondering why there are so many about how jim tressel is serious this year, I mean was he not serious last year? I think both teams are good and either team can win it (i'm a BR tiger fan). But It jsut seems silly to me, because i'm pretty sure he was serious last year, I know there is something to prove, but don't you have something to prove no matter how many times you go to a championship game, if you're there, you're there to prove you are the best, even if you've been 3 times in a row and won it all three times and your back for a fourth, or lost it last year, or are there for the first time in 4 years, you can say LSU has something to prove also, being the first 2 loss team, and winning an outright championship without a split decision, I know it's all fodder for the fire but, but they all have somehting to prove and I suspect tressel is not anymore serious than anyone else. I guess it's just media hype.
Good points most of you, i even like bagala's answer although i feel a little SEC animosity, but none the less he has his points, I'll say this for the last, because i am most tired of this comment, LSU has two losses and doesn't belong, I have not seen one comment that hawaii or kansas should be playing, all arguments that lsu has two losses are finished with the comment that OU, USC, Georgia, shuold be there, and they had how many losses, and this is the first time a BCS title has a 2 loss team, but there have been champions in college football for the last several decades before the BCS ws ever around, check it out, there are some two loss champs in there.