what is your opinion on this comment??

The right side of the blogosphere is all over the clueless media coverage of a new “study” and database compiled by “two nonprofit journalism organizations” that purports to show that BUSH LIED to entice American into Iraq. You would think by now that the MSM would try to spare itself some embarrassment and at least do a cursory Google search before casting the researchers as neutral, reliable, disinterested parties. But noooo. They dutifully published these transparent moonbat briefs for impeachment without disclosing the “nonprofit journalism organizations’” ties to BDS sugar daddy George Soros.

Here are a couple of inconvenient truths the AP story neglects to tell us:

* “A study by two nonprofit journalism organizations…”

The Fund for Independence in Journalism says its “primary purpose is providing legal defense and endowment support for the largest nonprofit, investigative reporting institution in the world, the Center for Public Integrity, and possibly other, similar groups.” Eight of the eleven members of the Fund’s board of directors are either on the BoD of the Center for Public Integrity, or else are on the Center’s Advisory Board. Thus these “two” organizations are actually joined at the hip.

* “Fund for Independence in Journalism…”

The Center is heavily funded by George Soros. It has also received funding from Bill Moyers, though some of that money might have actually been from Soros, laundered through Moyers via the Open Society Foundation

Anonymous2008-01-23T15:18:46Z

Favorite Answer

The truth is the truth no matter who says it.

you cannot destroy the truth by discrediting the source. Either the truth will stand or it won't.

If Rush Limbaugh (world's biggest liar) said the "earth is round", that's the truth and he is therefore correct.

If Mahatma Gandhi says 2 +2 = 5, he is a liar.

Soros is correct---Bush is a proven liar.

Princess of the Realm2008-01-23T15:41:47Z

It is a written fact that Soros wants NOTHING MORE than to bring President Bush down, any way he can. He's not satisfied that President Bush only has 11 months left in office, he wants to destroy him. So, yes, the source can be tainted. If I pay someone to print dirt on someone else, then yes, me as the source is tainted and should not be trusted.

Anonymous2008-01-23T15:25:40Z

Yes, the Left keeps trying to discredit this group of professional journalist who've won many awards and are considered leaders in their field yet they can never discredit the actual content of the report. Why doesn't the left side of the blogosphere do a little investigative reporting of it's own and discredit the report and it's finding?

Anonymous2008-01-23T15:20:30Z

Bullshite... you are just mad because something slipped by the grist mill... Soros? You are kidding right ... I mean where are you on Rupert Murdock, or how about those lovely folks at GE?
Media spin proliferates.. it's bad enough that it has completely derailed what little democracy was left in our republic but for you to get self righteous is absolutely ridiculous...
Bush Lied Thousands Died... not mine but apropos just the same

spicymnguy2008-01-23T16:49:48Z

George Soros? Why would anyone believe anything that faker had to say or support?

He is about as Un-American as you can get

Show more answers (7)