Which was worst, Hillary lying about sniper fire, or Obama lying about Bloody sunday to get votes?
Hillary claimed she was shot at, and Obama claimed his parents met and bloody sunday, when in fact he was born four years before that even ever occured. Obama supporters have been claiming that Hillary is not fit to be President because she lied, Hillary supporters claim the same about Obama, so tell me folks what is the difference between these two lies? Maybe they should both step down, because it seems to me that there is NO difference between them. If these were regular politicians I might let it slide, but these two morons claim to be "the new politics" about open government, and being honest... well they both lied about Nafta, and now they both lied, there goes open, and they both flat out lied about their histories, so there goes honesty.... seems like the same old crap that always runs to me. What do you say, whats the difference, why is your candidates comments less of a lie? What do you say?
At bloody sunday.
Beardog, bloody sunday was a civil rights movement in Alabma, he basically made up the story to get votes, he claimed that his mother and father were inspired by what happened in Alabama that day, and decided that they could be a couple because of what happened. It was a blatant lie used to get Alabama votes, by reminding them of precious racial memories that HE was not a part of. Its a complete attack on the trust of that community. Its one of the most well known civil rights incidents in history I can't believe you don't know about it.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0307/3304.html
theres a source, you can read the actual speech on Obama's website,
and the dates are very clear on several sites, including wikipedia.