Does anyone know that web-site? It is set-up by Chinese people to anti the CNN, BBC, etc. media corporation.
On 14 March, 2008. Most of you know what happened in Tibet, but lots of the western media (especially UK, US, Germany, France), they played huge joke on this. They are reporting the false news to the public while their purpose is to attact Chinese government.
Now, Chinese people are getting very angry about them, so, they set-up that website. I here welcome everyone to take a look at it, only for know the truth and shame those boradcasting corporations.
Here's a question comes, how can we trust them if they always tell lies which made by their governments?
Anonymous2008-03-28T01:13:53Z
Favorite Answer
Yes! the Chinese government is not all that open.
but the fact is that CNN, Fox news are so much more "politicized" and not much about the news itself (lobbying all the news according to their Government agendas!)
It just explains the general ignorant attitude of the American people who only "trust" their media with hearts and souls
shame on USA and its so called "freedom of speech"
The Media is there to make money. The more sensational the story(news), the more people will tune in, the more people the advertising will reach, the more money the media corporation will get. If the news is not sensational enough they will "make" the story more interesting by using different interpretations of what really happened. Bending the truth; using footage and interviews out of context.
Mostly the media is not influenced by government but, this is not always the case. This is where YOU have to decide. To blindly believe what the media is showing, is like following a blind person towards a cliff. By the way this happens more in Eastern and African countries than in Western ones, because a lot of Eastern and African Media corporations is State owned.
No. no longer anymore. they seem for hit and run headlines. final spring we had some flooding from a river the place I stay. A information team interviewed me approximately it. I pronounced I had some water interior the abode. even though it quite is befell till now and could take place returned. They rolled their eyes like i substitute into dropping their time, packed up their kit jointly as one in all their scouts walked down the line to locate somebody else. He discovered the main mentally risky female on the block. She cries on the drop of a hat. He motioned the digicam team over and that they interviewed her. She cried of direction, and listening to her you will think of the full city substitute into wiped out. and that's the interview that aired. Couple this with media's political insurance. They gave Obama a loose holiday - loose from difficult questions or asking him approximately his previous. he's the single they praised. So no. The media does not choose to checklist information. They the two choose to create it or type comments for the commonly used public.
When I heard the Dalai Lama say that he will step down as leader-in-exile of Tibet if the violence doesn't stop, I knew the newsmedia got the whole thing wrong. I remember how when the Soviet Union was around people would say, "When it comes to the Soviet media you need to learn to read between the lines because if they don't like it, they won't say it. Period." Most of the time the US media reminds me of that.