here is the link:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080518/ts_alt_afp/usvotegraphology
@ debra H : considering we are already electing presidents because they are black, or female or prisoner of war, so after all why not considering what they show or hide in the way they write?
@helios: yes Reagan was consulting horoscopes, and bush still consults budweiser
Java
Favorite Answer
Interesting article. From a People Magazine point of view. If you read the first paragraph it would appear that the author believes it is Obama, if you read the rest of the article Hillary comes out the most positive (and the first paragraph isn't a good introduction in comparison). It would be more interesting if the analysts knew absolutely nothing about the writers. But it is still all psuedo-science (if even that).
Anonymous
Well that might seem really really stupid, but wasn't it Reagan to consulted horoscopes to make up public policy?
Anonymous
Its all a joke- the people doing the interpretations know all these candidates and have simply stated their preconceived notions about each- nothing more
trickygirlb
Hillary
TruthSeeker
Oh, that's easy... Hillary.