Looking at how they did last year. AFC East had the Patriots go 16-0, but there was no other team above .500
The NFC North is usually called the weakest division and the 1st place team Packers were 13-3 yet there was no team that went 1-15.
What division do you feel is better (not team)? Why?
octavius27bc
Favorite Answer
The NFC North for sure. If you put the Packers and Patriots at the top of their division as they have often been in recent years, you can expect much more from the Bears, Lions, and Vikings than from the Bills, Dolphins and Jets. The remaining teams from the North will at least contend for the division, but not many will expect the lower AFC East teams to accomplish much.
Ц¢Ћîħå™
It's definitely the NFC North (Pats fan), because damn Dolphins make the AFC East weak with a record of 1-15 and none of the NFC North team go below like 4-12 last year.
the guy who says and does stuff
The NFC North..and not just because I'm a fan of a team in that division(the Packers) but because I feel it's a much more competitive division. When all of the preseason magazines and all the predictions are made...the AFC East champion is going to be unanimous..the Patriots. I think that NFC North is much more competitive from top to bottom.
Jordan
AFC East SUCKS like none other. The Patriots did great, but each team in the rest of the division had more losses than wins.
The NFC North is a better division, though they aren't exactly strong.
Mr. D
NFC north
a different team has won that division in the last...decade
the Pats are the only team in the AFC east that is even worth anything