Just wondering how you all feel about a lawyer making millions while laughing at niave supporters.
Is slaughtering innocent children really helping women's rights? It's frightening when you think about how the wool has been thrusted over many people's eyes.
Does it matter that "Rowe" has nightmares every night about the hell that she's imposed on America, and since has also changed her views on pre-birth murder 180 degrees?
holysocks1
Favorite Answer
Now infanticide is legal in some places here in the US. Where they take the aborted baby that has survived a partial birth abortion and let it die.
Whether a fetus was officially a living being used to be the reason for thinking it was okay to kill.
The "choice" should have been made to stop sleazing around by both males and females.
aspiring codger
Roe v. Wade is one of the worst things that has happened to this country. It is just as evil as Hitler killing millions of Jews in the holocaust. The better science gets, the more it proves the humanity of the unborn. Roe v. Wade supporters like to hide in the old science when unborn babies where thought to be only a blob of tissue. Well, with modern technology, the unborn are now known to be infinitely more complicated, organized, and advanced than previously thought. Brainwaves and heartbeats can now be detected very early.
Hey, here's a novel idea, how about since we define the ending of life as when the heart stops or when the brainwaves stop, why not define the beginning of life when there are detectable heartbeats or brainwaves? That is a scientific, non-religious way to approach it, but most liberals are too chicken to agree to that because they are so hell-bent on shedding innocent blood for convenience or economic reasons.
satcomgrunt
No Roe V. Wade was nothing more than a power grab by the Federal Government. The 10th Amendment to the Constitution states Any powers not here by given to the Federal Government are reserved for the states. Nowhere in the Constitution does it state that the Federal Government has a say in abortion one way or another, the feds decided that they must have final say in that. As for the other argument, the right to privacy, no where in the Constitution does it state directly people have a right to privacy. That was made up a ruse to help distract people from the thirst for power our Federal Government has.
wondermom
Rowe V wade doesn't effect me. So to me it's neither a good thing or a bad thing.
Abortion is not for me, but see my body my choice, not some white men in black robes. Thank you.
Should this be the only thing that matters rather or not a neighbor is getting an abortion??? When it comes go voting for a president??
Cause even if Row V wade was overturned tomorrow it will not stop abortion.
Bostonian In MO
A fetus is not a child. It cannot survive outside of the host.
It's the law of the land and won't change any time soon. Deal with it. If you are opposed to abortion then by ALL means do NOT get one. But neither you nor the State has any right to insert yourself into the private doctor-patient relationship.