Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Nic W asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 1 decade ago

Rowe v. Wade. A good thing? ?

Just wondering how you all feel about a lawyer making millions while laughing at niave supporters.

Is slaughtering innocent children really helping women's rights? It's frightening when you think about how the wool has been thrusted over many people's eyes.

Does it matter that "Rowe" has nightmares every night about the hell that she's imposed on America, and since has also changed her views on pre-birth murder 180 degrees?

13 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Now infanticide is legal in some places here in the US. Where they take the aborted baby that has survived a partial birth abortion and let it die.

    Whether a fetus was officially a living being used to be the reason for thinking it was okay to kill.

    The "choice" should have been made to stop sleazing around by both males and females.

  • 1 decade ago

    Roe v. Wade is one of the worst things that has happened to this country. It is just as evil as Hitler killing millions of Jews in the holocaust. The better science gets, the more it proves the humanity of the unborn. Roe v. Wade supporters like to hide in the old science when unborn babies where thought to be only a blob of tissue. Well, with modern technology, the unborn are now known to be infinitely more complicated, organized, and advanced than previously thought. Brainwaves and heartbeats can now be detected very early.

    Hey, here's a novel idea, how about since we define the ending of life as when the heart stops or when the brainwaves stop, why not define the beginning of life when there are detectable heartbeats or brainwaves? That is a scientific, non-religious way to approach it, but most liberals are too chicken to agree to that because they are so hell-bent on shedding innocent blood for convenience or economic reasons.

  • 1 decade ago

    No Roe V. Wade was nothing more than a power grab by the Federal Government. The 10th Amendment to the Constitution states Any powers not here by given to the Federal Government are reserved for the states. Nowhere in the Constitution does it state that the Federal Government has a say in abortion one way or another, the feds decided that they must have final say in that. As for the other argument, the right to privacy, no where in the Constitution does it state directly people have a right to privacy. That was made up a ruse to help distract people from the thirst for power our Federal Government has.

  • 1 decade ago

    Rowe V wade doesn't effect me. So to me it's neither a good thing or a bad thing.

    Abortion is not for me, but see my body my choice, not some white men in black robes. Thank you.

    Should this be the only thing that matters rather or not a neighbor is getting an abortion??? When it comes go voting for a president??

    Cause even if Row V wade was overturned tomorrow it will not stop abortion.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I am pro-choice but against abortion. It is a woman's choice as to what she wants to do with her body. If she chooses abortion then she will have to deal with the repercussions. If it is wrong to abort children then she will pay for it in the end.

    Woman will always find a way to have an abortion if they really feel they need one.

    When will you people learn that it is none of your business? Let people be more accountable for their actions. The government has no place in the woman's womb.

  • 1 decade ago

    A fetus is not a child. It cannot survive outside of the host.

    It's the law of the land and won't change any time soon. Deal with it. If you are opposed to abortion then by ALL means do NOT get one. But neither you nor the State has any right to insert yourself into the private doctor-patient relationship.

  • 1 decade ago

    I think that abortions should be avoided except for in cases of rape, incest, or when the life of the mother or the baby is endangered. It should also only be undertaken when both the mother and the father, agree, if he is available.

    In order to provide that, I suppose that yes, abortion should be legal, but ONLY to provide for the above mentioned cases.

    Cheers!

    ©2008 SinisterMatt. All Rights Reserved.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I don't get you pro-lifers. It's ok to kill a baby if it's a result of incest

    or rape and all the reasons you named?

    Either you believe in abortion or you don't. Does it mean that if the baby is a little girl and they want a boy then it's ok to have an abortion? For God sakes, get a clue. You sound ridiculous.

    Sorry, you can't always pick and choose your unborn.

    Thumbs up Cricket and Jolies

  • 1 decade ago

    I'm pro-choice regardless of my own personal beliefs...who am i to infringe my morals are beliefs on any other individual...and for those who are pro-life but believe in stipulations such as incest, or conflict of the mother's health who are you to say life is only important unless it interferes with other beliefs (it's either right or wrong)....and how is it that some who are pro-life are also supporters of the death penalty...are you aware of how many questionable death sentences exist...this law ignores morals and religion ... we as humans have free will and choice, don't forbid any person that right

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Look up Slaughter in the dictionary son....then look up Abortion. Get back to us. And by the way....When is the last time YOU found yourself pregnant? Be quiet and read.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.