Why didn't they test Tiger Woods' blood for alcohol after his recent crash?

Because he’s a wealthy and famous mixed race (careful, now) pro golfer who favors blonde Nordic-looking females with nice ...uh...‘backstrokes’....and happens to be the friend and golf buddy of many powerful Republican politicians, including Donnie Boy himself, so he’s definitely got some friends in high places.. Tread lightly if you’re a boy in blue and you don’t wanna find yourself on the unemployment line, I guess 

I am sure they did, like I was there, as YOU apparently were, have access to his records.  (It takes MONTHS to figure this out; it's not a 1 day thing.  So, sorry if they haven't you forgot.)

Because of who he was.  You or me would have been tested.

Police stated that there were no drugs or alcohol inside Tiger's GV80 at the time - and he showed no signs of impairment as he was pulled out of the wreckage.

In order to draw blood to check if he was under the influence, cops would need a warrant - meaning they would require a probably cause.

With no evidence suggesting impairment, police are not able to authorize such a move.

They did test him for alcohol and drugs. He was stone cold sober.

Driving at near 90MPH in a 50MPH zone ALONE would get YOUR license suspended and you would have heavy fines to go with it.

Yet when you are a millionaire you can bribe your way out of ANYTHING.

If this were Joe sixpack, he would have had a MANDATORY blood test for drugs, lost his license, and be setting in JAIL.

But as ALWAYS bribes can get you out of ANYTHING

The hospital did, they need to test that for surgery.  It's one of the "pre procedure" tests that are done before surgery.

For the same reason that nobody tested Ted Kennedy when he was drunk and horny, killing a girl in the Chappaquiddick matter many years ago.  i.e., money talks!

Dayum, Dixie... You done nailed it...

maybe they did that