What is the difference between "Islamofascism" and Judeofascism?
I don't see toomany Muslim states constantly attacking and bombing other countries. Lebanon,Gaza,Syria,threats to use nuclear weapons on "Israel". Is this the primary difference?
I don't see toomany Muslim states constantly attacking and bombing other countries. Lebanon,Gaza,Syria,threats to use nuclear weapons on "Israel". Is this the primary difference?
Zeno
Favorite Answer
Judeofascism is considered an ethnic slur while Isamofascism is not; I see no logic to that personally,but so it is,at least with the mass media. As to the rest I think Tripper nailed it down pretty well; Islamofascism is non-government and regardless of the low death toll all aggression by militant Muslims is Evil whereas all aggression from Judeofascists is Righteous,at least according to the mass media.
Willi B
Judeofascism is considered an ethnic slur while Isamofascism is not. The reason is simply that Islamofacism is the logical result of thorough application of islamic law. Islam is political by nature, and Mohammed was brutal ruler. Islamic fundamentalists want to re-created Mohammeds rule in Media, which was totalitarian. As Hassan Al Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, said: "Islam is very similar to Nazism". The term Judeofacism is an attempt by the politically indoctrinated mass media to create a counterpart to the concept of "Islamofacism". This is of course nonsensical, since the government of Israel is democratic and modern and protects the rights of non-Jews. Jewish religious fundamentalists have no political ambition themselves, so a Jewish state run by the bearded nutcases is pure fiction. Islamofascism governmental; you can see it applied in all theocracies where the Koran is the constitution and Shariah is the laws. The high death created by militant Muslims (20,000 terrorist attacks world-wide since 2000 and that is a random starting point) is real, whereas the so-called "aggression" from Judeofascists (aka the IDF) is fundamentally a response to endless attacks on Israel by the likes of Hamas, Hizb-Allah and Fatah. But according to the mass media, they are equivalent.
norvman
Well it was Islamofascism that brought down the World Trade Center... but then again... and less well known... Judeofascism has many insurgencies into other countries to assinate Nazis... so In my opinion there is NO difference... and the true word is "Religous Fanatic" more discribes what your asking... Unless I'm missunderstanding what your asking...
Anonymous
First off, Islam attacks offensively. Israel attacks defensively.
Islam is trying to turn the World moslem, and under the demands of their god (yes, lower case intentional). Islam does not mean peace, it means submission.
Israel has no such aims. All they want is to be allowed to exist, in the land that G-d provided for them.
Anonymous
I actually do see a lot of muslim states constantly attacking and bombing other countries.
Mogadishu
USS Cole
Berlin Olympics
Lockerbie
London Bombings
Spanish Bombings
9/11
Bali Bombings
Mumbai
Thousands of plane hijackings, car bombs, suicide bombs, embassy attacks.
Haven't seen too many Israelis blow themselves up inside some Western country's malls and taking out hundreds of innocents.
Talk to the native populations of countries where Arab muslims have decimated their populations and slaughtered everyone standing in the way of their empire building land grab.