WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE UFC JUDGES!?
So Clay Guida takes Nate Diaz down and he wins the round? Did they forget all those punches Diaz landed.
I bet that if the crowd was chanting Nate's name he would've won.
Who do you think should've won won?
So Clay Guida takes Nate Diaz down and he wins the round? Did they forget all those punches Diaz landed.
I bet that if the crowd was chanting Nate's name he would've won.
Who do you think should've won won?
neveroutnumbered
Favorite Answer
I agree Guida got Diaz back but did nothing. Plus Diaz was able to toss Guida to the ground from his back and land a lot more punches and I mean a lot.
Iron Jaw Jake
I remember Clay making some shots in the beginning, then Nate making some by the fourth or fifth round. But I remember more so, Nate only fliping Guida like two or three times while Clay had the majority of control over the grappling, a few take downs, and doing good enough in the beginning to maybe still win despite problems towards the end. So I agree with the decision, but Clay better finish next time if he is to rise in the league, he already has a stripped record.
DeltaSigChi4
In this particular fight, nothing was wrong with the NSAC-appointed judges. Clay Guida soundly beat Nate Diaz. Guida took down Diaz at will, and EASILY won rounds one and two; round three could've gone to either one, although I believe I gave it to Diaz.
E
Jason X
I agree Diaz landed more damage on Guida but Guida was on top more and went for more subs. I think the judges just liked Clays personality better and that swayed the decision just enough.Shouldve been a draw or another round.
Anonymous
Guida's whole game plan was just to hold onto Diaz for 3 rounds. I guess it worked. Guida never wins by anything but decision.