WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE UFC JUDGES!?

I agree Guida got Diaz back but did nothing. Plus Diaz was able to toss Guida to the ground from his back and land a lot more punches and I mean a lot.

I remember Clay making some shots in the beginning, then Nate making some by the fourth or fifth round. But I remember more so, Nate only fliping Guida like two or three times while Clay had the majority of control over the grappling, a few take downs, and doing good enough in the beginning to maybe still win despite problems towards the end. So I agree with the decision, but Clay better finish next time if he is to rise in the league, he already has a stripped record.

In this particular fight, nothing was wrong with the NSAC-appointed judges. Clay Guida soundly beat Nate Diaz. Guida took down Diaz at will, and EASILY won rounds one and two; round three could've gone to either one, although I believe I gave it to Diaz.

E

I agree Diaz landed more damage on Guida but Guida was on top more and went for more subs. I think the judges just liked Clays personality better and that swayed the decision just enough.Shouldve been a draw or another round.

Guida's whole game plan was just to hold onto Diaz for 3 rounds. I guess it worked. Guida never wins by anything but decision.

I had Clay Guida winning the fight. Clay got Diaz' back, landed more clean punches, and got takedowns.

Dong Hyun Kim got robbed by the judges. He won at least two rounds, maybe three against Karo. Karo did absolutely nothing in the fight.

I like Diaz and would've loved to see him win. But the judges were right.

Guida won.

It was a close fight for sure, but I think the judges got it right! But I think the Parisyan vs. Kim was a bad decision! Kim definitely won the first round and did enough the rest of the fight to get the decision.

Clay Guida won.

But judges can be controversial its subjective in the way they view things at times.

Best wishes :)***

i like clay, diaz is white trash.