do you believe that yahoo's "top answerers" exist?

i am more than a bit skeptical about the existence of some of the so-called "top contributors" on the leaderboards, particularly as most of the top ten have private questions and answers, leaving NO way to verify their activity.

on close examination it would appear to me that these are primarily "plants" by yahoo - probably employees, who have mined the boards for questions considered in need of "appropriate" answers.

i have been a member for the same length of time as "sunshine25 - Level 7 - 1486 Best Answers [in the journalism/news category] " but i have NEVER seen an answer by this supposedly extremely prolific answerer. supposedly having given 10, 863 answers over a three-year period means that she would have had to answer just under ten questions per day, EVERY DAY, for three years.

has anyone else ever thought about this???

Grumples2009-05-08T12:17:24Z

Favorite Answer

I have actually, and in all the time I used to spend here (as in literally all day at work and then when I got home - sad, i know!) I have only ever seen her answer ONCE and I couldn't believe my eyes...Never saw her again though so maybe it was my imagination.

Michael is always in here answering though, haven't really looked at the rest of the names.

Alonzo L2009-05-08T20:43:34Z

I know what you mean, it seems like most Top Contributors or Answerers just sit pretty atop their shiny green thrones, But I've seen Stephen K around two or three times actually, and it's amazing to see him out there. I believe there should be some type of cap, or rotation system in place, or once you get TC or TA, if you don't maintain point quotas, it'll slowly start trickling points out of your account. That, I'm sure, would send a shock wave through this community, of, as you charge, "top answerers".

?2016-10-20T06:29:42Z

the main appropriate reason to have self belief in god may be if he have been given off his **** and did some thing to tutor he exists. a million. a complicated synthetic merchandise might propose layout yet there is not any logical reason to word the comparable concept to a organic organism. 2. If the universe had a initiate how ought to there be something till now the start to reason it. 3. the elementary regulations of nature do no longer propose the life of gods. 4. DNA does not propose the life of gods. 5. Wishful thinking. 6. given which you think the two god and jesus genuinely existed.

goddess_oraorchid2009-05-08T20:51:47Z

lol, they make you a "top contributor" just to keep you quiet :D conspiracy people