does the new health insurance that allow kids up to age 26 to stay under their parents plan cost the child?

Is there an extra charge for the child or is that child covered by the parents plan with no additional cost up to age 26? When I read the new health insurance guidelines it looks like it could be taken either way. Please explain because I have a college student who is in this age group. Thanks

Anonymous2010-03-30T09:22:13Z

Favorite Answer

Oh yes, there will be an extra premium cost to insure the child (as there is now). The difference is just that the allowable maximum age for the child is being raised to 26.

How that extra cost is structured depends on the specific insurance plan.

A Hunch2010-03-30T09:23:05Z

It all depends on the plan and if this is the only child or there are multiple children.
Having children on a plan costs money, since it is the parent's plan the parents must pay, but that doesn't mean that parent can't tell the child to pay if that's what they want to do. Also, plans with children cost the same if there is 1 child or 100 children.

?2016-12-10T10:53:41Z

help your self - you may examine your prices in internet as an instance right here - DEALSQUOTES.archives RE Why are 26 365 days previous adults allowed on their mum and dad' health insurance plans lower than the hot health care regulation? I heard the president communicate after the very best court docket governed on the health care regulation and one aspect he presented out replaced into that fogeys would have their 26 365 days previous newborn blanketed on their health care plans. at the same time as i replaced into 18 my father's insurance did not hide me any further and through the time i replaced into 26, i replaced into procuring my personal insurance. That looks undesirable previous to nonetheless be lower than a mum and dad' health insurance. a good number of 26 365 days previous adult adult males and females are married and characteristic little ones. Are they nonetheless to blanketed on their mum and dad' health plan because Obama did not make any stipulation to that component of the hot regulation?