I can't believe the winner of survivor! Don't Click here winner revealed!!!?
I'm sorry! I'm just so disappointed!! I can't believe she won! Parv or Russ should have one! They were strategic! BULL!! lol. I'm just venting!. Plus how could Sandra leave her children? Isn't it bad enough their dad is always gone? She blew that million dollars she already won!? It's called investment honey! She's so cocky rude about it. SMH. EWWW SANDRA! Hope you google your name and read this comment! BOOO!! Don't spend it all in one place!
2010-05-17T07:49:59Z
I agree with everyone. Sandra didn't have a strategy. All her strategies failed. Thank goodness she's not in the service! - And you are right about getting more money. I was just venting and it's good she invested. I don't like being super rude but i couldn't stand her UGLY face any more! - Russell was rude and I didn't even like the way he treated his wife (compared to Rupert and his wife lol) BUT I wanted Russell to win last season and this season. He burned bridges HORRIBLY! lol. Thanks everyone! Will choose a vote soon!
2010-05-17T07:53:49Z
Done4 thanks for correcting my ONE. I'm sure everyWON knew what i meant lol i was so frustrated and didn't grammar check!
2010-05-17T16:58:00Z
Mike G. I read the first two lines and didn't bother. Sorry you wasted your time typing all of that. Perhaps someone else will read it. I did assume she spent. that was wrong but no matter how you look at it she left her kids for 40 days for a game show. Welcome to America
Susan2010-05-17T06:27:06Z
Favorite Answer
i agree too,didn't she admit she made her money being a survivor whore. probably to lazy to get a real job.she is just gross.i also don't think pavorti should have won either .she just hung on russell coat strings too.although she did win a few challenges. i think russell should have won it all. and everyone knows it. yea and how could sandra leave her children and not know if her husband was ok where he was employed at in the service. i hope she never gets a chance to play again.
Uhhh where did you get the news that Sandra left her children or spent her millions already? When the first thing you do is slander, what comes next out of your mouth is automatically discredited.
The game Survivor is part making it to the end and part influencing the jury. If you fail to see the beauty of that then you're missing out on the entertainment aspect of the game, which is: backstab to the top and convince those you've backstabbed to give you the million dollars at the end. That flip side makes this game interesting. There's a trick or skill involved in manipulating the jury. That's the fun part or one of the fun parts of this game. But if you say that the jury should only vote in a certain way then you lose the variable aspect or the human unknown aspect of the final decision. Without that unknown, in other words if you fix the game to be only played in one way or be decided in a strict manner i.e. "based on who played the most strategic game", then you lose the variable aspect of the game, i.e. the game would be boring since everyone would just play the same strategy to get to the top. By the way, winning the jury is part of the strategy, so who ever wins the game, i.e. winned the jury, is who ever played the most strategic game, since winning the jury is the ultimate strategy in this game Survivor.
Just because you don't like the final result does not make the game flawed. That's a sore loser talk.
I haven't watched Survivor in years before this season, and now I remember why. The way this game is decided is an absolute farce. It would be like, instead of having the championship for the NBA or NHL, they let all the other teams in the playoffs vote on who should be the champ. The sore losers would just vote for the "underdog," aka the one who performed the worst.
In this case, it was Sandra. She accomplished NOTHING at this game. The entire reason that she was there is because Russell brought her there strategically BECAUSE SHE WAS SO TERRIBLE.
But, as is to be expected, the sore loser squad didn't give even one vote to the man who won the game (Russell) and instead voted for the person who failed the most.
I'm glad Russell won the $100,000 fan vote. This show either needs to be decided by a fan vote or by some kind of final challenge (some kind of elaborate easter egg hunt or something).
This show is a ridiculous farce and I'm not going to watch it again until they change how a winner is decided.
Congrats to Graf, she merits to be the winner, she is the goddess of tennis... I enjoyed enjoying and thank you... and that i think of i'm tremendously pleased with the outcomes... so a strategies as i'm situation Graf and Navratilova are the two ideal of all time... of direction i'd choose to work out the two courtroom or Serena for third, yet Evert is likewise a clever participant to be third... so yah :D
Yes I was disappointed too. The jury HAS turned into a bitter bunch. Even Parvati said that if Russ had voted her out that she would have voted to give Sandra the money. I am super glad that Russ won america's vote. They need to go back to having a final two instead of three. At least that way, someone who is more deserving can win.