Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

I can't believe the winner of survivor! Don't Click here winner revealed!!!?

I'm sorry! I'm just so disappointed!! I can't believe she won! Parv or Russ should have one! They were strategic! BULL!! lol. I'm just venting!. Plus how could Sandra leave her children? Isn't it bad enough their dad is always gone? She blew that million dollars she already won!? It's called investment honey! She's so cocky rude about it. SMH. EWWW SANDRA! Hope you google your name and read this comment! BOOO!! Don't spend it all in one place!

Update:

I agree with everyone. Sandra didn't have a strategy. All her strategies failed. Thank goodness she's not in the service! - And you are right about getting more money. I was just venting and it's good she invested. I don't like being super rude but i couldn't stand her UGLY face any more! - Russell was rude and I didn't even like the way he treated his wife (compared to Rupert and his wife lol) BUT I wanted Russell to win last season and this season. He burned bridges HORRIBLY! lol. Thanks everyone! Will choose a vote soon!

Update 2:

Done4 thanks for correcting my ONE. I'm sure everyWON knew what i meant lol i was so frustrated and didn't grammar check!

Update 3:

Mike G. I read the first two lines and didn't bother. Sorry you wasted your time typing all of that. Perhaps someone else will read it. I did assume she spent. that was wrong but no matter how you look at it she left her kids for 40 days for a game show. Welcome to America

10 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    i agree too,didn't she admit she made her money being a survivor whore.

    probably to lazy to get a real job.she is just gross.i also don't think pavorti should have won either .she just hung on russell coat strings too.although she did win a few challenges.

    i think russell should have won it all. and everyone knows it.

    yea and how could sandra leave her children and not know if her husband was ok where he was employed at in the service. i hope she never gets a chance to play again.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Uhhh where did you get the news that Sandra left her children or spent her millions already? When the first thing you do is slander, what comes next out of your mouth is automatically discredited.

    The game Survivor is part making it to the end and part influencing the jury. If you fail to see the beauty of that then you're missing out on the entertainment aspect of the game, which is: backstab to the top and convince those you've backstabbed to give you the million dollars at the end. That flip side makes this game interesting. There's a trick or skill involved in manipulating the jury. That's the fun part or one of the fun parts of this game. But if you say that the jury should only vote in a certain way then you lose the variable aspect or the human unknown aspect of the final decision. Without that unknown, in other words if you fix the game to be only played in one way or be decided in a strict manner i.e. "based on who played the most strategic game", then you lose the variable aspect of the game, i.e. the game would be boring since everyone would just play the same strategy to get to the top. By the way, winning the jury is part of the strategy, so who ever wins the game, i.e. winned the jury, is who ever played the most strategic game, since winning the jury is the ultimate strategy in this game Survivor.

    Just because you don't like the final result does not make the game flawed. That's a sore loser talk.

    Source(s): common sense / logic
  • A
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    I haven't watched Survivor in years before this season, and now I remember why. The way this game is decided is an absolute farce. It would be like, instead of having the championship for the NBA or NHL, they let all the other teams in the playoffs vote on who should be the champ. The sore losers would just vote for the "underdog," aka the one who performed the worst.

    In this case, it was Sandra. She accomplished NOTHING at this game. The entire reason that she was there is because Russell brought her there strategically BECAUSE SHE WAS SO TERRIBLE.

    But, as is to be expected, the sore loser squad didn't give even one vote to the man who won the game (Russell) and instead voted for the person who failed the most.

    I'm glad Russell won the $100,000 fan vote. This show either needs to be decided by a fan vote or by some kind of final challenge (some kind of elaborate easter egg hunt or something).

    This show is a ridiculous farce and I'm not going to watch it again until they change how a winner is decided.

  • olvey
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    Congrats to Graf, she merits to be the winner, she is the goddess of tennis... I enjoyed enjoying and thank you... and that i think of i'm tremendously pleased with the outcomes... so a strategies as i'm situation Graf and Navratilova are the two ideal of all time... of direction i'd choose to work out the two courtroom or Serena for third, yet Evert is likewise a clever participant to be third... so yah :D

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Yes I was disappointed too. The jury HAS turned into a bitter bunch. Even Parvati said that if Russ had voted her out that she would have voted to give Sandra the money. I am super glad that Russ won america's vote. They need to go back to having a final two instead of three. At least that way, someone who is more deserving can win.

  • 1 decade ago

    Thank God Russell didn't win. I was hoping for Parvati or Sandra. I totally agree with with what Rupert said, he is a dispicible human being. If you're not going to play to win, don't play at all!! The social aspect is a huge part of the game.

  • 1 decade ago

    Rupert was loving towards his wife, and that made me like him. Russell and his wife were just too competetive. Apparently Russel pushed someone down in public but I cannot find the story to prove that.

    Sandra comes from a very Family Tight environment. She and her family take care of each other. I like her. I have liked her from day one. She always makes me laugh. She tells it like it is.

    Russell does not know what he is doing. He does not play to win. He so Screwed himself.

    Parv should have Won too... but she alligned herself with Russell and that was her downfall. She was a strong player. But perception is what won the game here.

  • 1 decade ago

    Actually if your curious about it, she has invested her money and has not blown it. She went on again because, who doesn't want more money? I'm sure that she left her children in good hands and was playing the game for them. Being a stay at home mom, wanting to be there when daddy can't be.

    And just so it is clear: hiding, riding coat tales, and following others lead is a strategy. Maybe not one that you like, but it is a strategy. One that she has won with twice.

    I'm not even a Sandra fan, but I don't like that people are dogging on her for a style of game play that worked. Whether I like it or not, I do respect it.

    I wanted Russell to win, because I like watching the aggressive and manipulating players. Not Povarti though, because she refused to own up to how she played the game. Russell stuck to his actions and even owned up to deal with the consequence's, meaning he knew he wouldn't win the game. But among the villains he at least had honor.

    By the way it is WON not ONE.

  • 1 decade ago

    I couldn't agree with you more!!!

    I don't even know where to begin here.

    Sandra's strategy was the shottiest strategy ever and IMO..she did NOTHING but ride coat tails through the entire game. She won no challenges and calls that a strategy??? Puh-lease!

    I honestly think Russell should've won...but at the very least...Parviti b/c at least she kicked butt in challenges and tried to outwit, outsmart and outplay people...whereas Sandra just sat around, with her stinking nasty hairy armpits and did NOTHING!

    I often wondered how, since her husband was deployed, how she could leave her kids. I don't know what her childrens ages are...but that I think its pretty sucky for her to leave them, with her husband gone.

    I have to say here...I have in no way shape or form described my total frustration in the way I wanted to...I'm so frustrated I can't form thoughts lol...how sad is that???

  • Koko Y
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    I agree, I thought she did nothing.

    I think the jury just hated Parvarti and Russel sooooooo much they would give to anyone but them.

    For being such an entertaining season, I was really disappointed with the winner.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.