Republicans Help me put together a list of discretionary cuts that add up to 1.1 trillion dollars?

No immature, Cuts across the board answers pleas.

I think that both morally and fiscally Social Security and Medicare are off limits because they have their own separate taxes and the bring in a surplus right now that the government is borrowing from instead of selling bonds to th public. But you could see it differently but remember you will have to make up the difference with your parents.

The 2010 Budget
Out of 3.5 trillion only 1.4 trillion is discretionary and the govt will only take in 2 trillion and look at what is discretionary.

Here is the discretionary part.
$663.7 billion (+12.7%) – Department of Defense (including Overseas Contingency Operations)
$78.7 billion (-1.7%) – Department of Health and Human Services
$72.5 billion (+2.8%) – Department of Transportation
$52.5 billion (+10.3%) – Department of Veterans Affairs
$51.7 billion (+40.9%) – Department of State and Other International Programs
$47.5 billion (+18.5%) – Department of Housing and Urban Development
$46.7 billion (+12.8%) – Department of Education
$42.7 billion (+1.2%) – Department of Homeland Security
$26.3 billion (-0.4%) – Department of Energy
$26.0 billion (+8.8%) – Department of Agriculture
$23.9 billion (-6.3%) – Department of Justice
$18.7 billion (+5.1%) – National Aeronautics and Space Administration
$13.8 billion (+48.4%) – Department of Commerce
$13.3 billion (+4.7%) – Department of Labor
$13.3 billion (+4.7%) – Department of the Treasury
$12.0 billion (+6.2%) – Department of the Interior
$10.5 billion (+34.6%) – Environmental Protection Agency
$9.7 billion (+10.2%) – Social Security Administration
$7.0 billion (+1.4%) – National Science Foundation
$5.1 billion (-3.8%) – Corps of Engineers
$5.0 billion (+100%) – National Infrastructure Bank
$1.1 billion (+22.2%) – Corporation for National and Community Service
$0.7 billion (0.0%) – Small Business Administration
$0.6 billion (-14.3%) – General Services Administration
$19.8 billion (+3.7%) – Other Agencies
$105 billion – Other

This is what is called mandatory spending. These are progams where spending depends on what they cost not how much Congress vote for them. No country has ever cut these programs without descending into anarchy which is not as much fun as it sounds. Think Somalia and having to steal for a living because everybody else is.

Mandatory spending: $2.184 trillion (+15.6%)
$677.95 billion (+4.9%) – Social Security
$571 billion (-15.2%) – Other mandatory programs
$453 billion (+6.6%) – Medicare
$290 billion (+12.0%) – Medicaid
$164 billion (+18.0%) – Interest on National Debt
$11 billion (+275%) – Potential disaster costs

2010-12-13T08:02:14Z

At any rate I bet we do no get one answer with more than 1.1 trillion in costs cut.

2010-12-13T08:02:58Z

At any rate I bet we do no get one mature answer with more than 1.1 trillion in costs cut.

2010-12-13T08:03:43Z

Cutting the military 100% would not come close.

2010-12-13T08:05:08Z

Like it or not ObamaCare reduces the deficit. There is no free Medical Care in ObamaCare and that Medicaid and Medicare line item goes down under ObamaCare.

Anonymous2010-12-13T08:39:05Z

Favorite Answer

First thing is to stop Obamacare before it starts. Even the most delusional members of the Obama administration are no longer pretending that is saves money.

Get rid of the labor department, energy department, labor department and education department. These organizations serve no purpose other than to spread a political agenda. If these people need their message spread they need to pay for it themselves.

Cut the other agencies at a REAL rate of 10%.

I would leave the military at current levels. We have seen that the world remains a dangerous place and cutting the military means paying to rebuild it at a more expensive rate. I would raise the budget of NASA because we cannot afford to slide backwards and I would leave the VA intact because we made a commitment to these people.

Any holes left and I would sell off large chunks of federal land. The US government own 1/4 of all of the land in the US. Sell it off and pay our bills.

Stereotypemebecauseyouknow2010-12-13T08:06:56Z

We could eliminate the dept of Education because I pay massive local taxes for our schools. The city has a dept, the state, and the fed, and they all do the exact same thing. Push the government to increase funding so they can get larger pensions.
I am also fine with cutting defense spending, foreign aid, and half the programs my state runs for the federal government which are all about patronage.

Do any of you Liberals understand how government operates? Do you realize that the money flows locally and the sharks divide it up? My city replaced a failed government housing program with a bigger, more expensive program that turned around and rebuilt the housing in the same area with just newer buildings. The problems are all still there. There is no solution. The solutions that were suggested are "racist" or "discriminatory" like building homes in the ghetto. That's right. Moving people out of downtown and development in the ghetto is racist, so we cannot do that, so we rebuild exactly where they were, and now have the same problems. PC liberals are idiots.

Anonymous2010-12-13T08:04:21Z

Well, Obamacare is $780 billion. Think that would help?

------> "President Obama's proposed budget would add more than $9.7 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, congressional budget analysts said Friday."
=======>>> "Proposed tax cuts for the middle class account for nearly a third of that shortfall.

The CBO and the White House are in relative agreement about the short-term budget picture, with both predicting a deficit of about $1.5 trillion this year -- a post-World War II record at 10.3 percent of the overall economy -- and $1.3 trillion in 2011.

Amazing how some feel that calling the government tax shortage is called an "expense".

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-06/obama-spending-plan-underestimates-deficits-budget-office-says.html
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=114x76522

Kae T2010-12-13T13:30:17Z

That is the problem in America right now. They had to fix up Social Security. None of the Disability are getting half of what the seniors were suppose to get. Before, they were going to fix that situation and they didn't. It makes no sense of doing these things and giving out things that seniors or elderly need and not the disability need. President Obama and Former Congressman Neil Abercrombie want to fix that rule they have and change it towards that process to disability people and not the seniors. The seniors get money from the jobs, investments,etc. Disability have nothing towards those things. Especially the young ones. They don't pay taxes.

Mr. Wolf2010-12-13T08:06:00Z

The cuts in the GOP pledge to do the same old crap aka the “Pledge to America” only came up to a little over $100 billion.

Real Libertarians know what the Cato Institute is. Tad DeHaven is a budget analyst on federal and state budget issues for the Cato Institute.

•The document immediately notes that the “lack of a credible plan” to tackle the mounting federal debt causes uncertainty for employers and investors. The problem is the GOP leadership doesn’t have a credible plan to address the debt, or at least this document doesn’t offer one.
•It disingenuously promises to “cut government spending to pre-stimulus, pre-bailout levels” when in fact it only intends to do so for a small portion of the overall federal budget. The reduction would apply to discretionary, non-security spending, which only accounts for about 15 percent of total federal spending.

Show more answers (7)