Did the USA Founding Fathers Forget One in the First Amendment (RE: Wisconsin vs big union bosses)?

We supposedly have freedom of religion and freedom from the formation of a national (or state) religion. The founders understood that religion was vital to western liberalism and well understood the downside to national religions. France required Roman Catholicism to work for the government, Russia required the Orthodox Catholic religion. England required the Church of England religion. Nazi Germany required Nazi Party membership (all other labor unions were banned) for government work such as postal carrier and railroad worker. Many joined these religions and the Nazi Party (actually the National Socialist German Workers Party) so they could get a good job even if they had no real beliefs/sympathy for them.

How is requiring a person to join a union, in the case of the federal government a government approved union, any different? I felt like such a hypocrite joining the postal carriers union so I could work as a geologist for the US Forest Service when they were at odds with what I believed. I seriously considered offering to take a big pay and benefit cut but knew that offer would just result in my not being hired. Nobody should be forced by government to be extorted in order to get a job. I think the forefathers missed one.

2011-03-11T06:54:45Z

Yes, I was talking about Russia at the time of the writing of the USA Constitution. Suspected what you said of current times but didn't really know.

Also understand at what unions are for but that is not the question. The question is how is being FORCED to join a union different from the other protections we got? I'm all for VOLUNTARY membership. It is the company's choice (for their convenience) to pay all the same wage negotiated by the union - they are under no obligation to do so so it is not a point in favor of forced membership.

Anonymous2011-03-10T04:30:49Z

Favorite Answer

Obviously you are talking pre-1917 Russia.
In USSR it was the membership in the Communist Party,
nowadays it is the membership in the governmental 'Russia United' party.
I cannot see any big difference though...
Orthodoxy now only has an informal influence on the government.

Any society has 'social lifts', US is not excluded.

?2016-10-02T06:17:13Z

i think of the finished Mason obsessive arguments are passe and meaningless i'm sorry to assert. in fact that maximum founding fathers did evaluate themselves to be Christians like it or no longer in the event that they have been masons or no longer. What we ought to continuously be gazing is what's the rustic right now. George Bush went on a marketing campaign to destroy Muslim countries in the call of 9/11. I heard a provider guy right now equate the warfare in Iraq with 9/11, how silly and naive. Now much extra certainty has come to easy approximately Rumsfield utilising faith to get the President in a well-liked-day marketing campaign against "terrorism" that's certainly code word for "Islam." Now we can shop speaking with reference to the mason who weren't all undesirable human beings or we can manage right now's fact. A u . s . that calls itself a Christian u . s . and is attacking all Muslim countries in the call of "freedom" "democracy" and "revenge for 9/11" we've attacted Iraq Pakistan Afghanistan Somalia shall we get the medicine off the streets, decreased the a million million abortions a twelve months, heal the land with peace and integrity, actual justice, a terror of God and admire for different's religious freedoms.

giginotgigi2011-03-10T01:38:23Z

Union can always be your representative to talk with your bosses. It can also protect you from your exploitation by your boss. It can provide lawyers to bail you out if your boss illegally fired you. There are many benefit for you to join the union. although unions are going to be cut in their power, they can appeal to federal court.