Taurus TCP .380 - Good or Bad?
I'm in the market for a pocket .380 and I REALLY like the Kahr p380 but do not want to spend that much on a .380. So that leaves me with a few options. The Ruger LCP, Kel-Tec, and the Taurus TCP. I really like the "good" reviews that I'm reading, like nice & smooth DA trigger pull and the slide locks in the back position after that last round is shot. Not to mention the lifetime repair guarantee that Taurus offers. And the fact that this particular .380 is made here in the USA!
HOWEVER, there are some reviews (written and on youtube) that complain of failure to feed/eject problems. I hope this is NOT a reflection on the quality of work in America! LOL... I'm just wondering if the people complaining of these issues are early adopters of this pistol because most new pistols (I believe this is 2 years old or more now) have their bugs in the first few runs. Also, perhaps these new gun owners of the TCP didn't read the instructions carefully and clean the gun properly prior to first use. And to use factory ammo and not some cheap reloads or something.
I WOULD like to know if you own this pistol (or have owned it) and what are your thoughts and experience with it.
THANKS for the help!
@Rooster thanks for the recommendation on the BG380. I didn't include that in my initial comparison because I recall reading some issues with that piece when it first released. Therefore, the thought of it as a contender got lost somewhere in the back of my mind. However, after reading some reviews and watching some YouTube vids, it looks pretty sweet. I want to go check it out at the LGS to see if the long 12 lbs trigger pull is manageable to retain accuracy. The only other negative (which is not a dealbreaker) is that I had my heart Set on a stainless two-toned gun. That was just an aesthetic desire but what it boils down to is Functionality. And it appears the BG380 might be the winner. Thanks again for the suggestion.