Would there be even more jobs for the rest of us if all women were to go back to the role that they belong: Mothering kids, cooking, cleaning, staying home, etc? Wouldn't this be better for society?
The only women who do get to hold a job would be single mothers. Would this be a good idea?
2012-04-10T13:38:43Z
A woman's greatest asset is her body, and her ability to do simple chores. Outside of that, women are not needed. I guess "single" females can be given a chance to prove themselves but if they must be treated the same way as men in the workplace. That's equality.
2012-04-10T13:39:37Z
Men can do secretarial work just as well and as fast as women. Probably even faster.
2012-04-10T13:49:05Z
Yes, there are exceptions to the rule, and I'm not saying that we should bar women completely from their goals. That's why I said they should prove themselves. Yes, there are women in all work fields but there has only been a handful that ever accomplished what men has. Where's the female "Steve Jobs" or "Bill Gates"?
Xavier2012-04-10T13:47:25Z
Favorite Answer
Don't forget about the sex industry. It would be nothing without women their work in that area is vital and appreciated.
The problem is there are few rewards in being a housewife. It is endless work with no benefits. Imagine cleaning the same bathroom over and over, every week for the next thirty years and not getting any praise, no money and no promotions. That is how we see it. Most women who want to have a family would prefer to stay home and raise her children and that is fine but many modern women see that as depressing and unrewarding. Secretaries like to be called administrative assistants now.
what IF Pigs flew ? its not gonna happen is it ? ... we certainly would progress in a slower pace given the fact than many of the people which are so helpful to our society happen to be women , examples : teachers , scientists , weather forecasters lawyers and so on and on , women are in almost all fields you can think of . .. plus you also have to realize than the fact than women are successful in many fields only means than men which want to be successful as well have to become better as well .
EDIT :
well we could say than there its only some few men as well which have accomplished what those men have , so does than mean than men which aren't as sucessful should be kept at home ? , also of course it is a right which anyone should have , the right to work , so why exactly should women be exempt from such right ? , i do not think there could be any reasonable reason to stop them from working .
Then there'd be a huge demand for people with secretarial skills - like book keeping, typing up letters, arranging files in neat stacks, shuffling them around, and then rearranging them in neat stacks, not to mention long breaks during breakfast and lunch, etc.
So yes, we'd have more jobs for men if all women stopped going to those 9-5 jobs.
No bro, it'd just put A LOT more stress on us. Even with all the unemployed man out there, we would have to work twice as hard to keep the economy at it's bad position, and even harder to try and improve it. Our life expectancy as a whole could drop 10 years from that amount of stress.