Should anyone want to be 'finite, exact and specific' are we only restricted to cite just numbers?

Whenever we tend to say anything we always run in danger to be misunderstood. Words seems to be translated differently from what we might have in mind. Some words could be used differently, with the exception of numbers. For example a stool might mean a chair or a table but two (2) or any other number cannot ever be meant a different numbers. Symbols could also be interpreted differently as well as gestures. Can we exchange and share messages finite and explicit other than by means of numbers?

Anonymous2012-04-27T08:56:40Z

Favorite Answer

Yes, you have to use finite and specific language. Legal contracts use this type of language. You could in theory create a new language where the words only have 1 specific definition. It would be a language built entirely from jargon.