Driver's licenses for deferred illegals - Arizona says "No", California says "Yes". Who's right?

"Arizona was the first to say no, and California -- home to more than 400,000 young immigrants expected to qualify -- was one of the first to say yes when deportation relief became available this week."

http://www.mercurynews.com/nation-world/ci_21327328/young-illegal-immigrants-will-be-eligible-california-drivers

?2012-08-31T16:16:49Z

Favorite Answer

It depends on whether you believe that those in the country illegally should be entitled to rights previously granted only to legal citizens.

Dan B2012-08-31T16:18:54Z

They both are. Driver's licenses are left up to the individual states to issue. It's not a federal driver's license, yet.

?2016-05-18T18:44:09Z

Spaghetti

?2012-08-31T19:36:44Z

There is no right or wrong here. I think they should be eligible for driver's license. This is about safety, not about benefits. The same with IDs. I do not see they they will benefit getting an ID.

ibu guru2012-08-31T18:56:58Z

Drivers licenses are a state matter and each state sets their own eligibility requirements.

Show more answers (8)