After 911, the US had the whole world on their side. If they did the christian thing and "turned the other cheek" the support for terrorists would have dwindled.
For the cost of the war, they could have rekitted every car manufacturer and power plant to produce cars and power that were not oil dependant. This would have destroyed the middle east's economy and sent it back to pre 1900 where its morals are. This idea was suggested by quite a few people before the US and it's allies went to war.
Instead the little 911 attack triggered the US to take the Catholic response and launch a crusade. This has done more damage to the US than any terrorist attack. It has destroyed the reputation of the US, cost more US lives than terrorism, turned large parts of the world against the US and cost the US taxpayer more than what they can pay.
Should the US look at complete withdrawal and go back to option A?
?2012-09-16T01:36:37Z
Favorite Answer
Afganistan was a matter the US had to take care of in response....Iraq was a joke.....The US should have withdrawn from the world and become a strong yet non-empire minded power. But doing so would have been such a reverse in foreign policy and would have given "victory" to the terrorist. Such move would have been a blow to GW Bush's popularity...
I agree we should elect some different folks that will take a different approach. Unfortunately we haven't seen Ron Paul rise up that we may have a leader that will surely pull us out of middle east conflict.
You are however missing some important elements; when it comes to the burden borne by the taxpayer, military spending only factors about 24%. A more significant portion of the budget is for health care and pensions, or more specifically Medicare and Social Security. Age demographics are such that the average age is increasing, and a greater proportion of baby boomers will retire in the next 15 years, and this is more financial challenge than war. The general problem is to plan to spend money now that our grandchildren will repay with interest. The solution is to have government do less and spend less.
There is always it seems, a 'reason' for war... while some countries go decades and decades without. I'm not from the US so I can't pressume to know why the difference.
American War of Independence Northwest Indian War Franco-American War Barbary Coast War Tecumseh's Rebellion War of 1812 Algerian War First Seminole War West Indies Naval Campaign Le Fèvre Indian War Black Hawk Campaign Second Seminole War Mexican-American War Navajo Wars Cayuse War Apache Wars Third Seminole War US Civil War Sioux War Comanche War Little Big Horn Campaign Cheyenne War Spanish-America War Philippine–American War The Boxer Rebellion Nicaraguan Campaign Pancho Villa Expedition/Mexican Revolution Haitian Campaign Dominican Campaign First World War Second World War Cold War Korean War Vietnam War Bay of Pigs Invasion of Grenada Invasion of Panama Persian Gulf War Somali Civil War Kosovo War Iraq War Afghanistan War