Is there a common ground to all evaluations?
Consider the case of my evaluating something as worthless and the case of my evaluating that same thing as valuable. Surely these two cases differ only with regard to the value judgment that is being made. Now consider the case of one evaluator's evaluating something as worthless and the case of the evaluation of another thing, which is as different as possible from the first thing, by another evaluator, who is as different as possible from the first evaluator. Is there a common ground to the latter two evaluations?
P.S.: The two value judgments must also be as different as possible.
Don H, I take you to mean that "judgment" still means something when all the variables are different, and is then not a mere word. That is indeed my question.
Agreed, LG, but would there still be a common ground if the first evaluator was a human being and the second evaluator an alien life form (whatever "life" means) that was as different as possible from a human being?