So Rand Paul is defending your right to due process. Shouldnt this be bipartisan?
So Rand Paul is standing there as long as he can to defend your right to due process. I have a serious question. Why is this not a bipartisan effort? Why dont you support his efforts? The point is, no president should have this power regardless of affiliation.
This isnt about party. This isnt about biases. This is about a right that was fought and died for, and it seems so many of you are so willing to throw it away. Please tell me, WHY?
@crybaby: Even if that is the case, he is still doing the right thing. You have explained nothing other then your discontent with him, and thats childish. Focus on the issue at hand, and how important it actually is.
@sadcat: i think we can all agree a drone strike against an american on american soil is not due process.
@mushroom: Were not talking about "armed suspects". Were talking about giving presidential authority to assasinate americans like you or I. History is filled with countless examples with this type of abusive power, all the way up until even todays time. Saddam Hussein, Muammar Ghaddafi, Pol Pot, Etc. im not saying Obama will use this power. Im saying a president, in the future, could potentially abuse this power. This is why it is important.