Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Jim Bay asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 8 years ago

Will Obama agree to not kill Americans in America without due process so the great Rand Paul can end?

His Filibuster?

Update:

Obama and Holder agree to not use drones in the USA unless the terrorist is putting people in eminent danger. Nice job Rand Paul that's one for people who love the constitution. Now get Obama to not us drone strikes in the USA that would be a state level police action.

11 Answers

Relevance
  • John W
    Lv 7
    8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Rand Paul doesnt not trust a government working outside of the constitution, its funny so many accept NDAA

  • nahas
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    i assumed President Obama grow to be vulnerable in this undertaking of national secure practices, yet yet there is complaining. i assumed the intel the Bush administration had grow to be good and irrefutable. Hmmm...

  • ?
    Lv 7
    8 years ago

    Evidently Rand Paul has never heard of the Civil War, where President Lincoln allowed the use of deadly force throughout the country. I suppose his father failed to tell him how President Eisenhower sent the National Guard to Selma with instructions to restore the civil order.

    The Constitution requires the Commander in Chief to defend the public peace against enemies foreign and domestic. If Rand Paul wants to be President he needs to learn the job description.

    Fortunately Senator Paul will get enough exposure to show the rest of the country what a moron he is. Don't expect him to win a second term, let alone advance further.

  • No, why should he agree to stop something he's not doing? Let anti-gay activist Paul "drone" on and on and on. (No pun intended.)

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    Democrats should reform the filibuster rule so that Rand Paul would have to go up there and keep talking until he drops. Then we will see the number of filibusters drop dramatically. Harry Reid goofed when he did not reform the filibuster rule earlier this year.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    Obama has already stated repeatedly that he would not do so.....which is why the filibuster is ridiculous.

  • 8 years ago

    Knowing our government, probably not.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    Nah, I think Rand Paul should just keep going. In the long run, it will just make everyone hate him even more than they already do.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    He already can't, but it's not like the Constitution has ever stopped the government from breaking the law before.

  • 8 years ago

    What do you think about obama?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.