Democrats propose $10,000 Dollar fine for Gun Owners who don't have Insurance.* Firearms Risk Protection Act requires buyers to have " A qualified Liability Protection Policy " before they are able to Legally purchase a Firearm.*...http://www.prisonplanet.com/democrats-pr
Go here. http://www.prisonplanet.com
Go here. http://www.prisonplanet.com
Can also be found here: Jan Morgan Media.com
janmorganmedia.com
NXile
Favorite Answer
Absolutely NOT. That is called "infringement".
Don't Fear The Reaper
Isn't it a source of continued proof that our education system is a failure? Seems so many Americans see our Rights as government granted privileges? Like driving is. We've no right to Transportation. Therefore the State CAN require insurance as a conditional.
Now, who wants to propose we demand Liberals carry Liberal Voter Risk Insurance? So we can sue for damages when one more Liberal fee, tax or regulation gets passed. Bad part is they'd just find a way to pay with our own money.
They will find themselves in a very bad position. If they expect I'll jump right on that and go buy indulgence insurance.
who WAS #1?
Hard to believe the Constitution allows government to demand insurance in order to exercise a Right.
Don't mention how Obamacare became a tax because that is different.
Don't mention car insurance because while traveling is a Right (Liberty Clause), when one asks for a drivers license (legally driving is different from traveling), one promises to obey all the provisions of the vehicle code.
The 2nd amendment guarantees a Right. I don't think insurance can be required to exercise a Right.
Answer: no.
BlkBear
Already have insurance on my guns as well as other items I own, and of course insurance on my vehicles, so if anything gets stolen, I replace the items stolen or damaged. Also have insurance for the off chance that someone comes onto my property and harms/kills themselves in some manner.
I don't see the need for gun specific insurance on the off chance that someone breaks in, and needs to be stopped with a firearm, to keep them from harming me or someone else in my home.
strech
As I've read comments from reps in the insurance industry say, just because it gets legislated doesn't mean they have to offer it.
So, if required by law to have, but no one offers it, in effect the second amendment is over, so it'll be time for the Supreme Court to make a ruling.