Why does Line 6 make the ugliest amps?

Seriously.

http://images.craigslist.org/00F0F_GH6ZixVa4P_600x450.jpg/

That thing is hideous. The standard placement of the Line 6 logo is just painful. It looks like a cancerous growth on the face of the amp.

I understand that Line 6 doesn't make the only ugly amps but they are the worst offenders and I just don't understand why. The company has little to brag about. Their main selling point is that their amps rip off other company's tonally via digital modeling. Why not rip off other company's better aesthetics too?

http://medias.audiofanzine.com/images/normal/gallien-krueger-206mle-32552.jpg/

That looks better.

http://middle8reviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Fender-65-Twin-Reverb.jpg/

That's pretty.

http://www.guitarmasterclass.net/wiki/images/c/c9/Marshall.jpg/

Who wouldn't want one of those?

Even this cheap Peavey

http://loyalkng.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/peavey-bandit-112.jpg/

And this piece of junk Crate

http://profile.ultimate-guitar.com/profile_mojo_data/6/5/5/4/655415/pics/_c360178_image_0.jpg/

Look better than this fancy Line 6 half-stack

http://www.sonicftp.com/news/images/snamm05_line6_hd75.jpg/

Even when Line 6 tries to go retro it ends up looking awful like a Star Wars Episode 1 spaceship...

http://line6.com/podstudioux2/images/ux2screenshot.jpg/

Torbjorn2013-09-05T02:36:24Z

Favorite Answer

That's not a question - it's a statement/opinion. You are indeed entitled to your opinion and I personally agree with you regarding the aesthetics of Line 6. However, it's still a personal opinion as opposed to a fact.

And seriously - have you checked your links. It is always nice when at least some om then work, just saying...

OU8122013-09-05T18:31:46Z

Personally I don't buy amps for their looks.