CEO of Exxon LOVES fracking unless it's near his ranch...why is that, I wonder?

Rex Tillerson, CEO of ExxonMobile, is a staunch supporter of fracking. But bring that business anywhere near his Bartonville, Texas, ranch and he'll sue.

Tillerson has developed a reputation for his unwavering support of fracking. The practice is key to Exxon's business, and Tillerson is highly critical of efforts to regulate it, according to Forbes.

"This type of dysfunctional regulation is holding back the American economic recovery, growth and global competitiveness," Tillerson lashed out on one occasion, Forbes reported.

But when remnants of fracking com to Tillerson's neighborhood his tune changes. Instead of concerns about America's best interest and Exxon's energy future, Tillerson's focus becomes the unpleasant effects it has on the quality of life and real estate values, Forbes noted. And he's willing to take legal action.

The Exxon CEO joined a lawsuit to shut down a water tower that's to be used to supply fracking near his ranch. And Tillerson isn't just a passive supporter asked to sign a community petition. No, he went to a town hall meeting to personally protest against the construction of the water tower, according to The Wall Street Journal.

News of the lawsuit arose days after the Weather Channel published an in-depth report of the nasty effects natural gas drilling has on Texas' air quality, Amy Silverstein wrote in her Dallas Observer blog.

To be fair, Silverstein noted, the lawsuit Tillerson and his neighbors filed doesn't concern itself too much with the larger implications of natural gas drilling. Mostly, the plaintiffs just want to talk about how a 160-foot water tower is too big and ugly to fit in wealthy, attractive places like Bartonville.

Though Tillerson is clearly against dysfunctional fracking regulation, the lawsuit charges, "This monstrosity will mock the purpose of the Bartonville zoning ordinance."

The lawsuit also describes the tower's location as "abnormal and out of place for the surroundings." In addition to not being pretty enough, Bartonville residents are concerned about the noise and traffic that will result from the heavy trucks hauling the water.

None of the concerns set forth in the lawsuit ever seemed to trouble Tillerson when those issues were plaguing other neighborhoods, Forbes stated.

And though the official outcome of the case remains to be seen, "the lawsuit already has a winner, and that winner is irony," Silverstein quipped.

http://www.moneynews.com/Markets/Tillerson-fracking-Texas-water-tower/2014/02/25/id/554608

So...is it OK to drill or put an eyesore water tower in impoverished rural areas?

Can you say "HYPOCRITE"?
How about GREEDY ****???

?2014-02-26T08:35:44Z

Favorite Answer

Both words fit him. He know the benefits and environmental issues with fracking so stay away from his property.

?2014-02-26T19:54:55Z

Wow! Almost every word in your question is a lie. You get 5 Pinocchios. He DID NOT join in the lawsuit to prevent fracking. He and others simply don't want an eyesore water tower erected near the town of Bartonville where they live. He didn't file the lawsuit, he joined his neighbors in supporting the lawsuit. It was mentioned that some of the water could be sold for fracking purposes which has absolutely nothing to do with the lawsuit.
Come on....Speak the truth or shut up!
Here's a link to what's really going on:
http://www.star-telegram.com/2014/02/24/5597785/water-tower-suit-involving-exxons.html

reader12014-02-27T13:00:03Z

Rex Tillerson really does not get it at all. He is more worried about the here and now aesthetics of his landscape than the very real environmental and health problems of fracking that can and will lie ahead. That kind of thinking is the scariest of all--no concern for tomorrow, just live for the moment, and screw everyone else.

graphicconception2014-02-26T22:04:29Z

G20 seems to have it about right. Michelle Smith of Money News has got half a story and is spinning it for all it is worth.

Tillerson seems to be agreeing with his neighbours that a 160' water tower does not comply with the local zoning regs.

@ Jim Z: Gore was a good hypothesis but Sagebrush has an actual example - it was Kennedy:

?2014-02-26T21:35:02Z

Remember Kennedy who didn't want a wind farm next to him? Ha! Ha!

Why do they need a 160 foot tower. Fracking can be done expediently without destroying the landscape. Maybe that is his objection. Did you ever bother to ask him?

At least his company is providing a service to this nation. What has Al Gore and his ilk done to get as rich as they are?

Ha! Ha! You are the real hypocrite.

Don't get me wrong, he not may be a nice person, I don't know much about him. But I do know he does more to better mankind than you greenies all put together do.

Show more answers (10)