After reading this story.
U.S. troops found nearly 5,000 abandoned chemical weapons in Iraq from 2004 to 2011: report
http://news.yahoo.com/chemical-weapons-found-in-iraq-nyt-report-135347507.html
Here is another article confirming the first article.
WMD found in Iraq after all, Bush was right: Pentagon 'hid' chemical weapons
http://www.examiner.com/article/wmd-found-iraq-after-all-bush-was-right-pentagon-hid-chemical-weapons
?
Favorite Answer
Liberals can either deny or not deny anything, anytime.
They can admit that old WMD from the 1980's were found after the 2003 invasion. Then they post a cartoon of SpongeBob SqarePants and say Nobody Cares.
They really truly don't care that the facts prove them wrong. They knew they were wrong from the beginning. It was all just propaganda and lies from the start. They didn't expect to be right, and they got what they expected.
What they expected is that their lies provided an excellent excuse for people to bash Bush and vote for
Democrats. When individual voters are shown the facts and they see that their excuse is a lie, they just shrug their shoulders and say they're going along with the crowd, so buzz off.
It really is all about mass hysteria and mob action with the left wing. Facts and logic mean nothing to them.
So of course, they say facts and logic mean nothing to you.....it's their standard playbook.
tehabwa
What we deny is that there were ANY on-going development programs for ANY WMDs.
That a few things were still around from the war with Iraq is now clear.
I thought all the lying sacks of sh*t morons of the right said they had all been moved to Syria, right before Bush's invasion. Have YOU changed YOUR mind?
Iraq had NO WMD-development programs in 2001 when Bush first started screaming his lies to invade Iraq. Iraq had NO live nuke program.
If you still think it was GOOD that Bush invaded, murdered a million innocent people, and murdered MORE Americans than Bin Laden; and caused the destabilization of the region, and the suicides and continuing suffering of hundreds of thousands of our troops, then there's nothing any HUMAN can say to you.
Anonymous
At what moment?
Iraq used to have WMD's, but with 2-3 campaigns against them, and sanctions for more than 10 years, they didn't have WMD's when George W. Bush invaded.
At the moment ISIS have gotten their hands on an awful lot of new-equipment(provided by the US, and UK in Syria) but there is no evidence of WMD's amongst them.
?
That's a double negative,what IS the question,in English ?
Joseph the Second
Can anyone Deny that going into Iraq- was a Big Mistake ??! :o