If we don't take the President's advice and combat climate change, what is the outcome du jour?
What are they saying today will be the terrible, avoidable punishment for not abandoning our way of life and paying him and his to fix it?
It changes so often, I get confused. (For anyone who can accurately define "science," you know that's not a good sign.)
So...does anyone know if these are the same "scientists" who KNEW we'd all freeze to death for the same reasons a few decades ago, or know if they are using the same "science?"
@Joe...we have to fight climate change to avoid terrorists getting nuclear weapons...that's a new one on me, and may I say...Wow.
@Tom....who "knows" that? I don't...many scientists don't. You're taking an unproven theory and acting as it's proven fact. Not only is that a waste of time, but it's potentially dangerous. What if it turns out to be wrong, and the "corrective" action is actually harmful?
@Mittens...yes, it does. There are those who think the outcome will be flooding. Then you have the weather people, then you have the "we'll all cook to death" folks. THEN, and I believe these are my favorites, you have the people who think that the horrible heat to come will spark volcanic activity and we will all be flambeed via lava. Of course it changes. Not all of it can be right...no one knows, which is why I question the "science." We're supposed to be changing something, but we