What is the "reason and logic" that supports atheism?
In a comment to my answer on a question an atheist made this common reply: "Eh, still doesn't change the fact that Atheism will prevail. Logic and reasoning eventually prevails over dogmatic religious beliefs."
I have given many examples of reason and logic that supports the existence of God in my questions. What is the reason and logic that supports atheism,,, I just do not seem to have seen any.
Bobby2019-05-16T01:56:35Z
With both Atheism and Religion, the basic question would be about the foundation of life on Earth.
An Atheist would have to believe in Evolution and the Big Bang Theory. The chances of the Big Bang putting the universe in place is about 1 in a billion or more. That is like saying that after the explosion of a bomb, logs, bricks and blocks of cement fall into place to make a building. So I am going to say that there is no basis for logic in atheism.
On the other hand, if we are to believe in religion and in a God, then we have to believe in a supreme being that we cannot see, hear, feel or touch. This seems illogical too. However, the belief in a supreme being makes explain the existence of the world much easier than it is to explain evolution or the big bang theory.
As such, of the two, I would chose to believe in a God that created everything.
There is no logic or reason that supports Atheism. There are only 3 possibilities: 1, There is no God, that is Atheism. 2, There is a God, that is Theism. 3, I don't know if there is a God That is Agnosticism. Because there are so many unknown facts in the Universe it is impossible to prove that there is no God. The reason that some people say there is proof that there is no God is either that they don't want there to be rules that they have not invented or tht theyare stupid. Those are the only 2 reasons why anyone could be an Atheist.
We must admit that religions are a jumble of false assertions, with no basis in reality and the very idea of gods is a product of the human imagination. It is quite understandable why primitive people, who were so much more exposed to the overpowering forces of nature than we are today, should have personified these forces in fear and trembling. But nowadays, when we understand so many natural processes, we have no need for such solutions.
Evidence? All those real "gods" currently only mentioned in folklore, myths, and movies