Should firearms be banned from the general public and limited to only security & law enforcement?

Y or N

2019-08-04T05:29:31Z

Scary place where we had the shooting in California Gilroy Garlic Festival just last week and today Texas El Paso Mall where 20 people were killed.

?2019-08-10T05:53:56Z

Yes, they are way too dangerous and no one is actully protecting themselves like they think they are.

daniel g2019-08-05T11:23:44Z

Not gonna happen in the US,,Hitler and Venezuela taught us that.
Just think, one armed citizen could have stopped the Walmart shooting quick.
These psycho shooters know they don't see the sun come UK,, they simply don't care.
All the more reason should carry guns.

?2019-08-05T05:01:54Z

How did that work out in Venezuela ? There was a recent video of a security forces vehicle running down protesters with impunity.

Matt2019-08-05T04:55:02Z

No.

Anything the police own, the general public should also be allowed to own.

Anonymous2019-08-04T09:34:20Z

Not completely no. I live in the UK and often people think guns are banned here but they are not, despite the handgun ban there are modifications that can be made to even make them legal, you'd be surprised at what is available compared to what people say. The restrictions have worked, some people still need guns like gamekeepers perhaps, some people use guns as a hobby but they are vetted first, or maybe they live in a remote place. I don't have a problem with that. Another myth is that you can't defend yourself with guns in the UK, you can, if you have a licence, people in remote places have shot burglars and were not charged.

Show more answers (13)