Why weren’t swords more commonly used in WW2?

Rusty Bubbles2019-12-29T21:24:29Z

Even back then, most knew better than to bring a knife to a gunfight.

Anonymous2019-12-28T15:27:28Z

The equivalent of the sword was fixed bayonets, attached to the rifle.

Joseph B2019-12-28T12:56:52Z

A soldier could kill more people with a gun than with a sword.  Further, if a person is aiming a gun at him, charging with a sword is not a bright idea.

Anonymous2019-12-26T13:53:05Z

Swords were designed for hand to hand combat. By WW2 the weapons had become so sophisticated, soldiers died trying to get that close.

Anonymous2019-12-26T09:54:54Z

Because more advanced weapons had been invented.

Show more answers (24)