How can Senate Republicans be trusted to be an impartial jury in the impeachment process?
Within 20 minutes of signing the oath book to verify impartiality, 45 turncoats voted the impeachment "trial" legality was questionable. This after having been the targets of T-Rump's insurrection. They should be tried themselves for violating their oath of office and the additional oath they had just signed.
It's unusual to "impeach" at this late date..and The House is just as "impartial" as The Senate when it comes to Trump.
So...here we go with 4 years of *still* fighting over Trump in Congress..meanwhile Americans are *still* waiting on their 2000 dollar stimulus (rolled back to fourteen hundred) while the judges decide which of Uncle Joe's EOs to bat down next.
We have more important fish to fry than Trump, and the only way he'll ever be "punished" is possibly by the IRS.
Our government needs to get real and start working for us..and ..even though you guys think the Republicans "blew it," the Democrats will be the next Party in the tar pit if you don't get your f@cking priorities straight and $hitcan "The Agenda."
Where in the Constitution does it say that someone not in office can be impeached? How can you have a fair trial if the judge and the majority of the jury have already voted to impeach him once? And how is this: "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard. Today, we will see whether Republicans stand strong for integrity of our elections" inciting to violence, especially when the violence had already started when he said it?