Anonymous
The American army with the English.
F
I think it’s a myth to say either side had “better” weapons. The Germans certainly had some good ( I know weapons aren’t good in any sense but let me use the word as short for advanced/ effective / well engineered etc), weapons especially their tanks and advanced jet planes and rocket technology., but so did other countries.
Britain was advanced in aircraft ( they had operational jets before the end), and conventional navy , USA and Japan were advance in aircraft carriers and the aircraft to go with them, and Russia’s tanks were nearly as good as the Germans .
So each had an advantage somewhere but USA ( and Russia to some extent) excelled at mass production, and could replace their equipment and supply their allies far faster than the axis could . So while the Sherman tank may not have been as technically good as a Tiger, if it outnumbered it sufficiently, it was going to win.
Anonymous
Both had weapons that were better and subject to improvement during the war that made them that way. You're seeking opinion. Germany never deployed an aircraft carrier in WW2 as an example how far behind Germany was in one aspect of weaponry. The US also had the proximity fuse and Norden bomb site which were other huge advantages.
Anonymous
that would be German most hand Guns made By Germany were Better the Only tank made by the Germans that Failed was the Tiger
the Sherman had only two Good Points easy to repair and easy to make
the Americans never had a Decent Fighter until they got the RR Mustang
In the end Germany Lost WW2 because they ran out of Fuel
Anonymous
German. German weapons like the MP40, StG 44, and FG 42 heavily influenced future weapons from multiple countries. The Kar 98k was a bolt action rifle that is praised for accuracy and range. Artillery such as the Flak 88 also proved very effective. The V1 and V2 rockets speak for themselves.