TheGOPHateAmerica
Favorite Answer
Yes and he soon will be
Penny Lane
I don’t think so now that the senate didn’t impeach him. If he would have been I would say yes. He has too many supporters. The courts will look at that.
Democrats need to stop with the insurrection claim. It’s beginning to turn on them. Kamala Harris bailing out rioters Which I didn’t realize until recently. These rioters bashed someone’s head open which can be considered an insurrection. Democrats have such a dangerous precedence with both of these impeachment trials end it has turned on them. She is an elected official which makes this constitutionally valid. I don’t agree with spite and hate but it has become a 2 Way St.
rev ricky
Of course. The jury of Senate Republicans were unindicted co conspirators. They helped sell the Big Lie.
Can you imagine Mike Pence testifying? How about his family? After that, he would have been convicted easily.
This is why they didn't want witnesses. The last thing on Earth they wanted was for Pence to testify while the tape of him and his family being led to safety.
Ivan
No, I don't think he would have. The evidence only existed in the minds of the leftys
Felonious Monkey
It would have been a very strong case. The main difference is that Trump could have been subpoenaed, questioned, and cross-examined. There are also dozens of insurrectionists who have publicly stated they were following Trump's orders when they attacked the Capitol. Their testimony would make this a near-certain conviction if it were in a courtroom.