NASA put it out there that they were to be showing a live Mars rover landing (according to what the news reported).  How big was the lie?

1)  No part of it was live
2)  In a video released by NASA, once the artificial animation showed the lander touchdown, they show the control room erupting in cheer.

2021-03-04T00:22:31Z

No, you see, Andre L, they reported that they were going to be showing the rover landing LIVE, and then all they showed was a gray picture.

There is no video.  That propaganda piece that you copied and pasted, noting the video now being available - there IS NO VIDEO.  Unless you are talking about that silly animation.

Rita2021-03-07T15:37:35Z

Indeed, this dangerous terrain required Perseverance to make the most precise Red Planet touchdown ever. The rover's landing ellipse was just 4.8 miles long by 4.1 miles wide (7.7 by 6.6 kilometers), compared to 4 miles by 12 miles (7 by 12 km) for Curiosity.

ReductioAdAstronomicus2021-03-04T10:14:13Z

Was anyone apart from space enthusiasts really interested anyway? Live or otherwise?

Notice how the manufactured hysteria has now totally subsided and the media and it's people have gone back to crime and sleaze. Such is the short attention span of the public with anything to do with space. So much for certain ridiculous hoped-for discoveries being "the most important discovery in history". In truth, nobody cares.

nineteenthly2021-03-04T07:14:18Z

It wasn't literally live in the sense that there would be a delay in the signal.

Sky2021-03-04T04:12:17Z

You're a fücking idiot.  Of course it wasn't live because there's at least a 7-minute delay between transmission from Mars and reception on Earth.  Haven't you ever learned about radio waves traveling at the speed of light?  It's not instantaneous.

ANDRE L2021-03-03T23:23:40Z

This 'question' is the lie.


Yes, it takes some time for the signals to get to Earth from Mars. So, the data was live in terms of it's arrival here.


The video from the lander took a while to download, and so was not seen at the same time as the landing. But, it does show what was happening at the time of the landing.

Perseverance’s flashy new cameras are expected to have captured much of the landing process. A camera mounted on the back shell of the spacecraft is pointed upward. It recorded a view of the parachutes deploying as it slowed to land. Then, beneath it is a downward-pointing camera on the descent stage, which is supposed to have filmed its first touch-contact with the ground on Mars. This suite of technology will provide us with the most detailed video and photo records of landing on a neighboring world yet. Lori Glaze, who heads the Planetary Science Division of NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, told reporters:    We’re going to be able to watch ourselves land for the first time on another planet.There wasn’t, however, a livestream of the footage, as we’re accustomed to with International Space Station events and rocket launches from Earth. The reason for this is a lag in data relay from Mars to Earth, which is slower than even old dial-up connections. Editor’s Note: the video is now available. See it here.

Show more answers (2)