Why due process if someone is CLEARLY guilty?
It is not a no brainer
It is not a no brainer
Zirp
so you can weigh the motive, and mental sanity
Mike
Who decides he is clearly guilty? Without due process, the decider may rely on his own subjective judgment. Due process is supposed to insure objectivity.
griggle
Because that's how we do it in the US.
Anonymous
If they're clearly guilty, then a fair trial by jury and due process will still result in them being convicted.