Could this accident potentially exceed my bodily injury coverage?
I rear ended someone 3 weeks ago. I reacted too late (yeah, I know...).
There were 2 people in the car that I hit - a couple in their mid-40s.
The accident was enough to cause major damage to both cars to the point where they weren't drivable, but we all got out of the accident seemingly uninjured. The police officer who came to the scene offered to call an ambulance, but they declined.
I had some minor whiplash issues in the few days after the accident, but it seems to have dissipated. I found out that the passenger of the other car was injured, but the driver did not report any injuries.
So my questions are as follows:
1. If the passenger was injured, but the driver was not, does that mean it is unlikely that the passenger's injuries were serious? I hit them from behind, so the passenger was not any closer to the exact point of the crash than the driver was.
2. Given that the passenger did not appear injured, and that the driver wasn't injured, how likely is the passenger's injury to exceed my coverage of $25k?
NOTE: I do not want to hear a lecture about how I should drive more carefully. I know....I also know I should have a higher BI coverage, but here we are....
Anonymous - How is the damage to the passenger and driver unrelated? They were in the SAME CAR. Like you said, the ENTIRE CAR was jolted, so why would the passenger be seriously injured but the driver not injured at all? Explain that.
Anonymous - Why are you referring to "both" people being injured? I made it VERY CLEAR that the driver of the other vehicle was NOT injured.
Anonymous - I did not ask that question before......but go ahead and report if you want to pretend to be the Y!A police, if that makes you feel better about yourself.
regerugged - I did say that my coverage was $25/50k. It has been less than a month since the crash, so I haven't heard much from them other than the immediate post-crash stuff. Can you also also advise as to whether it is possible to infer the severity of the passenger's injury based on the driver's lack of injury?
a - Good information. You mentioned "in my experience". Can you elaborate on what that experience entails?
May - Your answer is unnecessarily condescending. Why? You also misused the phrase "barking up the wrong tree". Why did you fail to use it properly?
Obi Wan Knievel - The "chatting" rule is ridic. I'm literally responding to answers to hopefully get better answers in the future. Also thanks for your response. What if the passenger just went to urgent care and got an MRI? Would that cost anywhere near $25k?