So, we can pretty much rule out climategate and solar activity as proof of AGW being incorrect. So what else do deniers have?
We can rule out climategate because even if these stolen emails were proof of fraud, (which they most probably aren't) this is just one data set. Most Data shows the globe is warming. I think we can rule out Solar activity too; data shows solar irradiance does not vary a whole lot. Someone posted a link showing that perhaps galactic cosmic rays influence Ozone REGIONALLY. Not an expert, but it seems to me that is a minor thing anyway, if true. What else you guys got?
2021-04-06T20:50:51Z
Two good answers :)
Diracpegminer2021-04-06T17:59:04Z
Favorite Answer
I'm afraid they don't have anything, so instead they try to claim that everyone is me (I previously had the Dirac account, which I closed several months ago). These other causes ("natural cycles") that they would have us believe are the cause of the current warming can be rejected at greater than the 99.9% significance level. The rise in global temperature closely follows the logarithm of the increase in CO2 in the atmosphere, just as expected.
Dirac, I find it funny how Elizabeth and Georgie totally distanced themselves from you. Here's some advice for next time you troll. Instead of being a total narcissist, try to be a team player. You totally screwed it up for your co-workers.
Remember when you were starting to get the mods' attention by reporting everything? Then, all the sudden, Yahoo Answers announced it was shutting down yesterday.
Since yesterday, the mods are totally ignoring you. They don't give a crap. Guess you lose again, dlckhead! ha ha ha