Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Should the USA invade Iran next?
Perhaps Bush has enough on his plate?...Iran next...why?..or why not?
9 Answers
- JLv 42 decades ago
No, We should not invade Iran. What goal are we going to accomplish by invading Iran? Maybe, not alot is going to get accomplished. We already have more than enough to do to fight the War on Terror and help the Iraqi's gain their independence for their freedom from terror. We should be working for our way of life and we should send a clear message to the terrorist who wish to do us harm. "We will not tolerate terror as a way of life in the US and our allies and those who terrorize us shall be severely punished, Americans should not have to live in fear of terror"
I think taking Saddam out of power was more than enough reason to go to war in Iraq. He was was the weapon of mass destruction to the men, woman, and children of Iraq. It's sad that we lost soldiers in the process. Make no mistake, their service to the country should always be remembered with honor and respect.
- 2 decades ago
I don't think that Bush should go around taking over countries because it isn't right.Yes he is helping the iraqi people also he is killing our country's troops as well. Millions have died already in Iraq and we shouldn't have anymore troops going and invading another country and then destroying it as well. So we should just leave the country alone and if something is going on then yes let the united nations know. Let them take care of it not the united states.
- Yahoo GuruLv 52 decades ago
I think Bush is afraid of big countries. Afghanistan and Iraq are small countries. Iran is a big country of 70 bio. people. If countries are big or powerful enough, Bush make them allies instead, like Pakistan (with many people) and Saudi Arabia (with lot of oil). Although these countries have dictaturships as cruel as Taleban and Saddam.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 2 decades ago
No, I think we should take whatever it would cost to invade Iran and invest it in alternative energy sources, rendering the need for war in the Middle East moot.
- 2 decades ago
i am a young male repressed iranian.
point of view of:
# a young male repressed iranian = yes
# a super religous iranian fanatic = hell yes bring it on!!!
# a moderate middle age wise iranian = no please
# a caring woman of any nationality = NO!
# an average non iraqi sunni arab = yes kill'm
# a well informed iraqi = no if u do they'll rip my country apart with their undercover forces
# an israeli politician/general/musad ag/centre voter = yes they are the greatest long term threat to our country even a unsuccessfull invasion serves us fine.
# a well informed american = no if u do they'll rip iraq apart .... kill hundreds of american troops beside we don't have the troops, the peoples backing, the money, the international support, a realistic plan, OR a possibility of sucess
Source(s): a sharp mind and a keen eye - Anonymous2 decades ago
Bush is not "taking over" other countries san.. and you said "millions" have died in this war.. thats a gross exageration of epic proportions.. try thousands.. Saddam killed over 300,000.. bush has yet to top that number yet in iraq.. furthermore.. when america attacks another nation we rebuild it. thats why wars are so expensive.. we have never just destroyed everything and left it.. we built japan into a superpower after WWII..
- 2 decades ago
no but iran should invade america next so it'll be a lesson for america to not invade other countries