If global warming happens, will there be more or less irrigable land on Earth?

It is impossible to say either way.

The problem is that wetaher is a chotic system. We simply have no way of predicting what the effect of any change will be.

At the moment we can't even establish conclusively whether the current wamring event is unusual.

Global warming is a myth. While the affects are real and we are currently experiencing the affects and will continue to for awhile, the idea that the world will some how come to an end is media propaganda. Little know fact that is not known globally to our advantage, the ozone renews it self. It is not a non renewable resource. It is probably better off that the mass media spreads the ignorance that the world is coming to an end so that we can see some motivation towards technological advances. As far as your question goes, if you really want to knows, do some research eco-economics research. I am sure the correct answer is out there but not on this website. I would start here http://www.abetterearth.org./ It is a eco-economic based and will better assist you with your global warming question.

The question is asking for a measurable answer that is not possible. Also other inputs are historically more significant, like technological change and environmental degradation. Global warming has occurred several times in history and the empirical evidence shows temperature fluctuations corresponding closer to sun spot activity than human behavior, so enjoy the ride and eat heartily.

individuals - bypass and carry out a little self sufficient study and you will all comprehend that this has occurred before chinese language naval instruments have been in a position to navigate over the North Pole 1500 years in the past by means of fact there became no ice Vikings lived on Greenland and had farms there - by means of fact there became no snow Romans had vinyards in England by means of fact it became heat sufficient. the perfect 'greenhouse gasoline' is WATER VAPOUR no longer CO2. a guy expels greater CO2 biking to paintings then a motor vehicle could produce. we choose CO2 to maintain this planet going - do no longer have faith me? What could the flowers breathe? you comprehend, those issues on the commencing up of the foodstuff chain? stop merely listening to the Dogma. a genuine scientist continually seems upon issues skeptically, this is the default place of all actual scientists. question what you're advised, seem up commerce recommendations and make up your guy or woman suggestions. Figures produced have been manipulated to cover the inconvenient fact - the temperature has no longer risen severely this century - it is evidenced by means of 'scientists' - no longer CLIMATOLOGISTS please be conscious, now asserting that the oceans are performing as a sizable warmth sink... different than the oceans are not relatively getting any warmer. do no longer have faith me? good. i'm surprising, yet bypass seem up the data to objective and practice me incorrect - bypass do a sprint study.

Well how about we do not study global warming at all and make our cars run on electricity. We have the technology, it really shouldnt be that easy money wise. Go read about it at some .gov site about economic stuff and all it is, is just greedy people that are head of Exon or Enron or what ever you call who the head of thoughs companys i would like to call fat basterd.

with global warming the overall global temperatures would rise. 1 degree may sound small but it is bad news for everyone. with rising temperatures the ice (includes glaciers) would melt. this will cause water levels to rise and would ultimately lead to submerging of land.

what will happen to irrigable land? well i think now you can figure it out yourself.

Emanuel veikovsky stated in 1935 that if you warm the globe,

(this is so simple)the temperatures of the oceans will rise,(what happens)They evaporate!(elementary my dear Watson)....and then....it comes down as rain in warmer climates,and snow and ice in colder ones,the arid land get water,grow more crops,tropicals get-even more rain water,(fresh)rain forest grow..back...and the polars get more ice and snow.,Good for the bears,bad for the Eskimos.

Man i could really go in to detail. Pick up one of his old books,and don't tell Carl Sagan.He is trying to get all the credit for his revolutionary thinking.He just 60yrs late,

An old Orthodox Jew from Russia,and probably the smartest man to ever .. ever write a book on the planet. Now give credit were it belongs his wife helped with his writing and theology,Put me in mind of Einstein.but that is another story.

Less. Because global warming will cause an ice age!!! Believe it or not that's what they say.

Much smaller population.

there is still very little data to derieve for sure... global warming would melt polar ice caps.. but that i dont think would cause any subsequent rise in fresh water..