Is Micheal Jackson a pedo or really just and adult male who really digs kids?

your exactly right my man!!! Look at all the good things this Man has done for the world!! But when some negative news stirs, all the people including the ones calling him a sicko turn agianst him, and wasn't even there during the alleged time of the situation!! HOW STUPID IS THAT!!?!? He hasn't done anything wrong to anybody but his self for setting his own self up with allowing some old kid spend the night who has some dumb a s s money hungry parents!!!!

Pedo

I'd sure like to believe the best in people, and give them the benefit of the doubt. And for awhile I kind of wondered, because I can see why some people would like kids so much; they're innocent, naive in a sweet way, not hardened and bitter like most adults (like myself hehe).

However, I've heard too many things, like the different pieces of evidence. Dirty magazines and other things I can't remember made me feel like he was hiding something.

Plus, if he were a normal adult, knowing what people thought he was doing, he wouldn't give it a chance to happen again. But I think he just couldn't help himself. Sexual deviants often can't, seems like.

Some powerful celebrities think they can have anything they want. I'm leaning toward the pedo angle and it seems to be a repeating behavior which is characteristic of one.

What you have mentioned is surprisingly plenty it. i assume people who've made such assumption have not relatively study surely court data concerning to those trials? They certainly lack even established concerning to the two situations. First the declare of a huge sum of money being paid to 'close the 1st case up'. It replaced into revealed some years in the past on television that it replaced into paid by technique of the insurance enterprise for negligence, no longer newborn intercourse abuse of any variety. on the data it mentioned that the accuser's mothers and dads could confirm that no intercourse abuse of any variety had ever passed off with a view to declare the money. so, what's with each and all of the hysteria declare of it to be 'hush money'? @Arielle 911™ first be conscious that i'm no longer judging you on any particular way, I merely want to clean some issues up. in case you study the court transcripts from the 2005 trial you will comprehend that there had merely been 3 accusers. 1st Chandler, 2d Francia and 2rd Arvizo. Chandler and Arvizo claimed molestation whilst Francia claimed something approximately sexually irrelevant behaviour being exhibited. (Francia claimed that his testicles have been touched). whilst in the time of those sessions of situations between each and all of the three claims there have been no corroborating newborn witness that mentioned any style of irrelevant habit to have ever been exhibited. And for the its alright to sleep in mattress with little ones element, do you definitely have confidence that if he had something to hide, he would say it as we communicate out on television? If there replaced into something incorrect, do you think of he would admit to it so somewhat?

Wacko pedo

You never really can know for sure. While I do agree that people are greedy and keep trying to take advantage of his wealth, it seems that he would be smarter and try to avoid the same situations over and over again.

anyone who takes a unhealthy interest in kids like he dose has to be a pedo

Pedo.

personally, i think Mike is a adult who refuses to grow up and wants to hang out with kids, not a ped.

you could say i grew up with Mike, since i have been watching him grow up on TV all my life and he is 3 years younger then me.

as child i thought he looked good with his big fro and darker skin, and when he was natural, but since he got his face lifts he does not look as good as he did when he was Young.