Why should?

no, that was the angle it was asked from right? don't worry about it babe, some people here are just plain rude.

I dont read the bible as a science book, do you?

people read the bible because they believe the writers were inspired by a greater being while they were writing it.. it tells the story of a group of people being in contact with a divine being.. all these are not explained by science but by religion

Science should stay with what they can prove, and leave religion to faith

I see that you were looking for scientifically minded people to address your question...There is some logic in posting it in the Science-Other category.

However, without clarifying that this is what you're looking for, the question seemingly belongs in the Religion category.

Perhaps you could repost it, asking for certain people to respond, or maybe try to connect something from the bible to a scientific issue.

WTF? I already responded to your message explaining in great detail the reason that I said that. Let it go and stop getting all butt hurt over one freaking question.

You also said that you put it in that category because you THINK religion can be considered a science because that was the way it was at your school. You didn't say it was because you thought it was a non-religious question.

Because the Bible is mostly a religious book.

The bible dose not have topice from science, its about aou salvation, Evolution has nothing to do with our salvation, ill bet thats what your refering to. Maby god made animales that evolved. anyway, darwin did not belive the thery of evolution, it was just a thought he had.

Vanessa, just as soon as I understand what it is you are talking about, I can respond.