Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Dark Matter,Black holes and the Big Bang!?
This is just a theory on these subjects and I would appreciate any serious conclusions in the possibility that this is possible or not. I believe that dark matter is a residue from black holes. I do not believe this time we live in is the "First BIG Bang", I think we do not even begin to understand or realize the true age of our universe. I think that Black holes act as giant disposals; randomly feeding on the areas of space they are located. We now know that Black holes can merge and become super massive black holes. I think that over the course of many of hundreds of billions of years, the black holes keep moving into each other as they continue to consume all in their path. Then at some point the center of this unbelievably large black hole, (math and physics we could never comprehend) is so dense, that bang, and we do it all over again. The evidence to this I feel is to be discovered in Dark matter and a, as yet to be discovered, wavelength. Maybe in 3or4 more Big Bangs, we'll know
The wave length concept that I have deals with the observation that everything in this Big Bang has a singular constant on some undiscovered wavelength. The theory being that before each big bang there was still some matter left over from the one before it, the little bit of matter, that was missed as the black holes grew larger, guessing that even if the Black Holes sucked up 99% of all the matter before they collapsed and exploded, That 1 % not dragged through the process of a new Big Bang will resonate still at the wavelength of its own Big Bang. This is how I believe when it is discovered, the theory can be justified. Unfortunately, the debris would be pushed to they very edges of our universe, way beyond our technology to find it.
10 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
The idea of multiple bangs isn't anything really all that new. Just pick up pretty much any book on modern physics (like that Elegant Universe book people were mentioning). People do not know the causes of Big Bangs and even the idea of a "cause" for a Big Bang is something that's a little strange to wrap your mind around, as is the "age" of the universe in the sense you are talking about.
The reason for this is that the Bang wasn't an explosion in space and time, but OF space and time. That is we can't be sure if there was a "before" the big bang, because we don't know any sort of time or space existed "before" it. As causes are generally considered to happen before the effect, this poses a considerable conceptual problem.
Dark matter isn't anti-matter and I have no idea what prompted that person to say that. Dark matter is matter that is just that, dark. We can't see it and black holes (if they do indeed exist) would fall into that catagory.
There is more of an issue to figuring out where all the matter is in the universe than just dark galaxies can explain. Even in some galaxies we CAN see, there is a SIGNIFICANT amount of matter that we just can't account for.
I'm not really sure why you think your traveling, all consuming black holes would one day just blow up. But again, big bangs are explosions OF space and time, not IN space and time (as your version of a bang would be), and you could experimentally verify the difference by variations in the Cosmic Microwave Background (what we use to tell how old our universe is), so long as you were in any of the matter that wasn't in your super duper black hole. Maybe bangs like yours can happen, but I wouldn't call them "Big Bangs".
In the case where there is no matter outside your black hole, that is what people call "The Big Crunch". Again, I think the Elegent Universe talks about that one, but if not I know that "Big Bang" by Simon Singh does. Actually, I'd really recommend reading that if you are interested in this subject.
Honestly, you lost me on the wavelength thing. I'm not sure what you were going for there.
Hope all that helped.
Source(s): Reading a lot and paying attention in class - darkpheonix262Lv 41 decade ago
love the question, but the theory is that when matter falls into a supermassive balck hole is get crushed and ripped apart into somethin called quantum foam, WHICH mabey resonsible for dark energy, an enigma, and seeming to cuase the universe to expand at and excelerating speed. could also be the elusive Zero Point Energy, ever what stargate atlantis, uses a power sorce called an ZPM or Zero Point Modual, which has a micro universe in a bottle, a self contained region of sub-space time, physists explaind this as Quantum Foam
- 1 decade ago
if your looking to know about black holes and and the big bang I think your theory is a little off. more importantly dark matter is anti-matter. and black holes are more like rips in space between regular matter and anti-matter. as far as the big bang theory you are semi correct about the joining of the holes to create a big bang. according to brian greene (physicist and writter of the elegant universe) the big bang might have been a colision between the two surfaces of all positive and regular matter and all negitive and anti-matter. if your looking for some more knowledgable answers i suggest reading "the elegant universe" by brian greene
- 1 decade ago
well im not sure about the black hole residue thing but its possible that it wasnt the first big bang. cuz the universe keeps expanding, and then eventually the matter will not have a center of gravity so it will contract again and get pulled into a new center of gravity, and maybe a new big bang.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 1 decade ago
No, sorry we HAVE discovered Dark Galaxies already.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1101869.stm
These galaxies, stars and matter make up 90% of the Universe, so now all we need to do is locate more and similar items like these. Nice thinking tho! Keep it up.
Do a Yahoo search for Dark Galaxies.
- 1 decade ago
Check out "the Elegant Universe"by Brian Greene on PBS.
Source(s): Also check out "Super-massive Black holes on IMAX. - St NLv 71 decade ago
good theory. Way beyond current math. Big Bang is reset and so we will probably never know the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Maybe. You lost me, after do it all over again. Your theory seems good. BUt whatever youdo, stay away from the black holes, because you'll never be able to leave one.
- 1 decade ago
MORE THEN U BERGAINED FOR
NEVER WHAT U ASK FOR?
WHO AM I?