crick fans: here's a question on eng v pak contreversial 4th test and lots more?

1a. A PREMATURE DEATH.

2a. ICC WILL DECIDE THAT.

1b. YES. PAK HAS THE ABILITY.

2b. SALMAN BUTT & AFRIDI.

3b. I COULDN'T FOLLOW YOUR 'Q'.

1c. NONE.

the controversial against pakistan and england fourth test was very crucial by ordering that test to pakistan .

1)pakistan will not pull out of the odi series because first of all they have lost their test series and they have to take the odi series in order to beat england in 1 series also otherwise pakistan is waste.

2)darrel hair is correct because he just saw the ball scratch after the umar gul over.in order the darrel hair can be wrong because when peterson hit the shot that went for 4 may be if it hit the wall and the ball has been scratch.

3)shoib malik and salman butt are the perfect openers for pakistan because if afridi will come in the openers place he will only hit the shots 6 or 4 in my opinionimran farhat is also not a good opener.shoib malik is in form and salman butt is also in a form and if 2 players who is in form will start the innings then they will get a good start.

4)no ian bell and chris read should not start the innings because they both are defensive players and they r not ok in giving england a goodstart and trescothick and strauss r perfect players to start the innings and ian bell should be come at 5 or 6 place and chriss read should come after the ian bell.

5)lasith malinga is not in a form because if we see the test series against the south africa he has not done well.marcus trescothick by seeing the series against pakistan he has not scored so many runs he scored the runs at an average of 39.50 runs that i not good.salman butt is not in a form in tests but in odi he is in a good form.imzamam is a player in these options who is in form and has played a good innings against england.but if u see in the series of england vs pakistan ian bell,andrew strauss ,mohammed yousuf,harmison,umar gul,monty and younus are in a good form.

1.. it was a good test whihc pak could have won but daryl hair didnt want so...

2. inzi is corect coz hair just saw the state of the ball and said it has been tempered without any evidnce

1. yes pak will pull out if ICC punishes inzi

2. in ODI's it is hafeez and akmal...in test matches..farhat and hafeez

3.chris read is a better choice..bell is not a real good batsman..his recent form was abbove par...he will fail in ashes if he gets the chance

1a. malinga

1-disappointing, shames the game and hearts the crowd

2-Unless Hair has proof, both are wrong

1-If Hair umpires the matches

2-S. Malik and S. Butt

3-No, get the more experienced batters up there and the ones you can rely on, both are not in the right frame of mind and the team dont have enough confidence in them

1-Malinga(Maybe)

Trscothic(I dont think so)

Butt( Ummmm.... No!)

Inzi (Yes......No!)

Pakistan have been involved in ball tempering for a number of times.So,if there is something wrong with the ball,there are chances that pakistan might have done it.Pakistan should have solved the problem with negotiations.

Hair is absolutely correct.

i think they will pull out

shahid afridi and salman butt are perfect openers

no

m trescothick is in good form

1. in my opinion inzy & his team take wrong method of protesting,it is not the correct way & according to law also............

2. hair is correct according to international standards of umpiring,any umpire will do the same if this situation occurs...........

3. perfect openers for pak will be s.butt & s.malik.

4. i think malinga.

well Inzi did the right thing. If the 26 cameras couldnt catch anything of the ball, how did Daryl Hair see it.

In a uncommon feat, ICC Elite Panel umpires Billy Bowden and Tony Hill of recent Zealand will create heritage on Thursday through growing the first impartial umpires from a similar united states of america to officiate mutually in a try tournament. Bowden and Hill will be in value of the fourth and intensely last try between England and Pakistan on the Lord's Cricket floor the following. "To umpire with my fellow New Zealander Tony Hill for the first-time ever in a try tournament will be particular," Bowden, who will be status in his 62nd try, stated in an ICC fact. "To be at Lord's and to create a touch piece of heritage through being the first 2 impartial umpires from a similar united states of america to umpire there makes it tremendous particular. certain, it will be a proud second for us, our households, New Zealand Cricket and to all our fellow umpires in New Zealand," he stated. Hill, who like Bowden hails from Auckland, stated, "to say i'm searching ahead to the Lord's try is an irony. even even with the undeniable fact that I have already stood there for some shorter version video games, to get to face in a try there is fantastic. To have a Kiwi at the different end is an advantage and the full outcome of the get mutually probably received't sink in for a lengthy time period yet.

hair should be banned to umpire for asians

none of them was correct

NO

there arent any, shoaib malik is a better choice

no, they should be on no 4 and 5

salman butt is surely not in form

Q1: Inzy

Q2: Pak should pull out so subquestions are nt valid

Q3: b