Seeking Community opinions again, 4 part question. PART 4?

Hi again The Grand Inquisitor,

I have already commented on Parts 1,2 and 3 of your question which has generated a lively debate on issues relevant to 'Yahoo Answers', especially how the questions and answers are judged when there is a report of abuse.

In my answer to Part 3 of your question, I have already pinpointed, and reiterate here, the need for a system of adjudication before a question or answer is rejected or deleted, especially based on reports from readers who consider them abusive!

After all, on reporting abuse, the Community Rules have stipulated that one may not use the Report Abuse link for purposes other than reporting a violation of the Yahoo! Answers Community Guidelines or the Yahoo! Terms of Service and may not report abuse for posts that one personally disagrees with, or by people one personally dislikes!

The Yahoo Community Guidelines also mention that one may not post content that contains profane, obscene, vulgar or sexually explicit language. In this context, you are right to say such a rule in this case should have been applied to the question as well.

But there is a catche-22 here dear, the word 'hot' in the question - what does it imply? Does it mean the woman referred to therein is bodily hot or sexually hot or hot-tempered or in any other sense of the term? So, it is a debatable point too!

Anyway, at the end of the discussion, as for future, what needs to be done by Yahoo Answers team perhaps is to make the rules crystal clear and be flexible. For instance, if a question or answer is considered not conforming to the community rules, then the YA-Team can ask the questioner/answerer to reword or restructure the question/answer. Every action draws its own reaction. A trivial/stupid question may invite trivial/stupid answers. A vague question like the one you got to answer may be interpreted in different ways by the readers and thus, the answers may not always be appropriate and to the liking of all readers! So, YA-T should consider both and treat both equally!

Well done, a pretty interesting discussion generated by the pretty-faced 'The Grand Inquisitor'! Keep your inquisitive mind alive and active, and keep up your good work dear in every field, in every situation and in every way you are fervently fond of!

Good luck!

__________

Thanks for your addendum you adorable dear. I highly appreciate your appreciation of my humble thoughts and your concluding wishful remarks! By the way, I thought we were stepping, or rather have already stepped into Autumn to be followed by Winter! Spring is a while away! (Ha..Ha..); Anyway, cheers baby!

Right on sister!

Power to the people that want a fair forum.

My belief has been insulted many times over and I have only reported the game players, not the people that are answering how they feel, not with a mind game of crap.

I will start to report ant short answer as gaming for points, I will do as some in here do and look for things I do not like just so I can impress my will, what have I got to lose, many people get away with it, I will just do what I have learned and create so many alter egos I will never be able to get booted.

You're quite right, this is about as ignorant as the christian united states government giving people freedom of speech and religion.....so long as it's christian..I think you brought up a very good point, and it's insulting to think some people are so bigoted that they chose to close their minds in such ways. OFCOURSE God may be a female, and she may be the most beautiful being that ever lived. I dont not however consider god as a direct entity, more of a consuming intellegient force that results in all things in the universe and beyond.

hi, The Grand Inquisitor , First, you look rather extraordinarily and extraordinarily warm too! 2nd, to the question, that's a fantasy to tag and link what we like or dislike to 'GOD' while surely God is what we are! 0.33, on your answer, perchance you will have prevented being so specific in expressing your perspectives on intimate relationship between a woman and a guy, even with the undeniable fact that ironically that's what we are all uncovered to day in and outing! 4, there are obstacles to work out freedom of religion and expression as quickly as that workout enters the international of public at great! 5, because I evaluate connection with God for what we do precise or incorrect as a fantasy, I do question the top of the abuse reporter 'INSULTING THE ALMIGHTY=GOD' while he or for that count every physique won't be able to % out who that almighty is!

Haven't seen the other Q's yet, but if you've received a violation notice, there's a way to appeal it. The link is in the notification email you received,

But, again, I would be surprised if you hear anything from them.

Perhaps the second suggestion, banning the religion region, may be best for us all.

I disagree with you - you are make demands that your absolutes are what must be followed - that makes you no better than the person or persons who reported your original answer.

Dear Outlaw,

I have to agree, and support your position in regards to Yahoo’s forum. Regarding your original answer, it sounds as though you are not appreciated nearly as much as you deserve.

i agree all should be banned not just this part or that part

i agree with duke . well said dear im with u